|
|
Post by philh on Jun 1, 2015 11:44:36 GMT
50 for 5. I'd settle for 100 all out.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 1, 2015 11:50:23 GMT
50 for 5. I'd settle for 100 all out. We need to achieve something like that and not allow what's happened in the last two games, where we've bowled well, allowed partnerships to develop and struggled when batting. Easiest solution would be to get them out for 75 tops. |
|
Steve
2nd XI player
Posts: 55
|
Post by Steve on Jun 1, 2015 11:50:30 GMT
55 - 6 Patel gone!!!!!!!!!!!
4 to Mags.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 1, 2015 11:52:44 GMT
34-4 off 13. Great start. Now for Mr Patel. Done. Who do you want knocking over next, howard, because you are clearly the man calling the shots this morning...  |
|
|
|
Post by philh on Jun 1, 2015 11:58:32 GMT
Taylor + Hales = 6 - that's some achievement. I hope we can get well on top in this game. You'd have to expect Taylor or Hales to score some runs in the second innings.
|
|
|
|
Post by sussexforever on Jun 1, 2015 12:05:38 GMT
Forgot they were playing this morning - delighted when I checked 15 mins ago! What's the deal with the over rate, has there been a delay or purely due to CJ and Mags being unchanged?
|
|
|
|
Post by hhsussex on Jun 1, 2015 12:06:52 GMT
Forgot they were playing this morning - delighted when I checked 15 mins ago! What's the deal with the over rate, has there been a delay or purely due to CJ and Mags being unchanged? They lost quite a bit of time because of a rain shower - which helped to refresh our bowlers  |
|
|
|
Post by hhsussex on Jun 1, 2015 12:25:46 GMT
The ever-amusing Trent Bridge Live blog ( live.trentbridge.co.uk/) has two mentions of "bowler-friendly conditions", one "helpful pitch for the bowlers" and an "a tad unhappy with the dismissal". Should we put them in touch with the Warwickshire dressing-room and camp-followers so that they can form a Support Group? |
|
|
|
Post by howardh on Jun 1, 2015 12:33:17 GMT
Anybody will do, Borderman!!!!
Or rather any four will do!
|
|
Steve
2nd XI player
Posts: 55
|
Post by Steve on Jun 1, 2015 14:11:03 GMT
Slightly disappointed now 107 runs for 1 wicket since I last posted!!
4 bowlers, probably not enough variety, maybe time for Wells or Nash himself?
|
|
|
|
Post by philh on Jun 1, 2015 14:14:57 GMT
I'm finding myself turning from optimistic to pessimistic.
|
|
Steve
2nd XI player
Posts: 55
|
Post by Steve on Jun 1, 2015 15:41:39 GMT
I feel vindicated but well batted young man!
|
|
|
|
Post by philh on Jun 1, 2015 15:47:36 GMT
Easy to be critical from afar and after the event, but perhaps the variety of Wells should have been tried 100 runs earlier. Disappointing even if it was a good knock.
|
|
|
|
Post by philh on Jun 1, 2015 16:05:14 GMT
Must be some time since a no.11 batsman (albeit at T20) opened the innings in the next match.
|
|
rusty
2nd XI player
Posts: 46
|
Post by rusty on Jun 1, 2015 16:19:29 GMT
Disappointing but not at all surprising.
200 runs from their last four wickets at not much under six an over and we lose two early wickets for 16.
Wonder what the pitch and overhead were like?
|
|
