|
|
Post by coverpoint on Apr 28, 2021 11:52:54 GMT
141* off 109 balls for Eastbourne v Cuckfield.
|
|
|
|
Post by sponge on Apr 28, 2021 14:24:54 GMT
141* off 109 balls for Eastbourne v Cuckfield.
Isn't that old news? He is part of a young Eastbourne team full of talent; and is a decent bat by all accounts. Think he was at Bedes. |
|
|
|
Post by coverpoint on Apr 28, 2021 17:48:01 GMT
141* off 109 balls for Eastbourne v Cuckfield.
Isn't that old news? He is part of a young Eastbourne team full of talent; and is a decent bat by all accounts. Think he was at Bedes. When I heard a former bedes player had signed for Sussex I expected it to be Lenham rather than Sarro. |
|
|
|
Post by sponge on Apr 28, 2021 18:37:00 GMT
There doesn't seem to be any intention of giving more Academy batters rookie contracts. It's all about the quick bowlers. In my humble opinion this is very shortsighted. Talented batsmen need to be given rookie contracts; get paid a minimum wage and learn their trade.
|
|
|
|
Post by coverpoint on Apr 28, 2021 20:50:30 GMT
There doesn't seem to be any intention of giving more Academy batters rookie contracts. It's all about the quick bowlers. In my humble opinion this is very shortsighted. Talented batsmen need to be given rookie contracts; get paid a minimum wage and learn their trade. They need to be good enough to be offered a contract but I would have put Lenham ahead of Sarro in the pecking order to be offered a contract. |
|
|
|
Post by liquidskin on Apr 28, 2021 20:53:13 GMT
There doesn't seem to be any intention of giving more Academy batters rookie contracts. It's all about the quick bowlers. In my humble opinion this is very shortsighted. Talented batsmen need to be given rookie contracts; get paid a minimum wage and learn their trade. Weren't there one lately? Can't remember his name, it sounded namey? Clarke before that, Haines... Anywho, get him in, he can have Claydon's number if Sarro doesn't want it. |
|
