|
Post by moderator1 on Sept 17, 2017 6:01:13 GMT
Now that we no longer have thoughts of promotion to distract us it's time to look at the fascinating struggle for life at the foot of the First division. All life is extinct within Warwickshire, who have played more First divison games than any other county; for a time Sussex were second to them. That leaves: 5 Yorkshire 12 3 4 5 0 0 22 29 0 124 6 Somerset 12 3 5 4 0 0 21 34 0 123 7 Middlesex 12 2 3 7 0 0 27 31 2 123 Yorkshire will play: Warwickshire (h) Essex (a) Somerset's games: Surrey (a) Middlesex (h) Middlesex fixtures: Lancashire (h) Somerset (a) Will we face last year's Championship winners, now possibly condemned by the mud of Uxbridge; or the England Test player factory with it's expensive ground repayments to the Graves Family Trust to meet; or will it be the perennial good triers Somerset, with their fragile batting but searching bowling? All votes in by close of play Tuesday September 19th. Thanks to coverpoint for suggesting this topic.
|
|
|
Post by coverpoint on Sept 17, 2017 7:59:29 GMT
I fear for Middlesex. Their problem apart from getting so little play at Uxbridge is the fact that their last game is at Taunton. Can Rayner out bowl Leach on current form? No. Two wins out of twelve is poor. I think they need to win their last two games or certainly win one and draw one.
|
|
|
Post by moderator1 on Sept 20, 2017 6:31:18 GMT
Well, that didn't seem to capture much interest, which surprises me a little because it is so closely run a race and has some quite interesting subtexts to it, such as the future of second division cricket whentwo Test Match Ground counties are stranded in Division Two. On the one hand its further bad news for Sussex because it is a certainty that Warwicks and AN Othershire will pay out to get a top-class squad in to go back up straight away, but there is also the idea that the ECB might have to find still more funds to prop up the beleaguered Second Division mediocrity counties for a while and postpone the inevitable withering away into a single league of 10 or 12 supercounties if its stars aren't all seen to be shining quite so brightly.
For the record, your votes were split equally, three each between Somerset and Middlesex and nobody fancied Yorks for the drop. After thge first day of this penultimate round of matches - which might be the decider, hence the early closure of the poll - the honours were split:
Middlesex all out 233 and Lancs 113 -5 (2 points so far) Somerset 269 and Surrey 42-0 (2 points) Warks 219 and Yorks 62-1 (3 points to Yorks)
|
|
|
Post by philh on Sept 20, 2017 10:30:34 GMT
In Division 2, it's possible that we could stop Notts getting promoted - unlikely, I know, but possible if Worcestershire and Northants can keep up their late charge. That could be even worse news for next year if Warwickshire, Middlesex and Notts are all in Div 2.
|
|
|
Post by coverpoint on Sept 27, 2017 2:55:23 GMT
In Division 2, it's possible that we could stop Notts getting promoted - unlikely, I know, but possible if Worcestershire and Northants can keep up their late charge. That could be even worse news for next year if Warwickshire, Middlesex and Notts are all in Div 2. Or Hampshire, Warwickshire and Notts.
|
|