|
|
Post by tiptoes on Jul 13, 2023 5:14:52 GMT
Thus far, the revelations of Edward's deviance may not yet have fallen the wrong side of criminality, although there were more reports of his tawdry behaviour against BBC employees on that programme's Newsnight channel last night.
Edwards apologists have no excuse for finding other scapegoats, like the Sun, to try and excuse his dysfunctional actions. The fact that the Sun has said it will now cease to print any further unseemly developments about this highly paid media presenter is to its discredit and caving in to mob rule.
If the aforesaid is a Christian as his profile suggests, through his Bible he could find redemption for his sins and seek the salvation of Jesus Christ to give him an inner peace from the turmoil for which he himself has created.
|
|
|
|
Post by gmdf on Jul 13, 2023 8:03:55 GMT
The Sun 'story' was a deliberate attempt by the Murdoch media to attack a rival (the BBC). In order to do this they deliberately misled the public over this 'story' (ignoring the fact that the young person involved denied the story as told by his estranged parents). Time for more press regulation, starting with closing all Murdoch titles, I suggest.
|
|
|
|
Post by tiptoes on Jul 13, 2023 8:36:08 GMT
The Sun 'story' was a deliberate attempt by the Murdoch media to attack a rival (the BBC). In order to do this they deliberately misled the public over this 'story' (ignoring the fact that the young person involved denied the story as told by his estranged parents). Time for more press regulation, starting with closing all Murdoch titles, I suggest. How did they deliberately mislead the public? There was no suggestion by the Sun that a crime had been committed although further investigations might counter that. Stating that a story is "rubbish" is far from denial. Very nonspecific dont you think? And where did the complainant get the money to pay for his lawyer to make this generic comment? |
|
|
|
Post by gmdf on Jul 13, 2023 8:51:36 GMT
The Sun 'story' was a deliberate attempt by the Murdoch media to attack a rival (the BBC). In order to do this they deliberately misled the public over this 'story' (ignoring the fact that the young person involved denied the story as told by his estranged parents). Time for more press regulation, starting with closing all Murdoch titles, I suggest. How did they deliberately mislead the public? There was no suggestion by the Sun that a crime had been committed although further investigations might counter that. Stating that a story is "rubbish" is far from denial. Very nonspecific dont you think? And where did the complainant get the money to pay for his lawyer to make this generic comment? Time to follow NZ and ban the US citizen Murdoch from running British companies. The Sun misled the public (e.g. 'lied') about the allegation from the start, as I said above. Your comments are pathetic 'whataboutery' of the first order. Oh, and here is a useful guide to all the stories the Sun published about this in 6 days:  |
|
|
|
Post by therealab1 on Jul 13, 2023 9:37:21 GMT
Thus far, the revelations of Edward's deviance may not yet have fallen the wrong side of criminality, although there were more reports of his tawdry behaviour against BBC employees on that programme's Newsnight channel last night. Edwards apologists have no excuse for finding other scapegoats, like the Sun, to try and excuse his dysfunctional actions. The fact that the Sun has said it will now cease to print any further unseemly developments about this highly paid media presenter is to its discredit and caving in to mob rule. If the aforesaid is a Christian as his profile suggests, through his Bible he could find redemption for his sins and seek the salvation of Jesus Christ to give him an inner peace from the turmoil for which he himself has created. You condemn Huw Edwards who hasnt committed a crime according to the police. You imply Rolf Harris is a bit of a national treasure. The obvious traits are there! |
|
|
|
Post by tiptoes on Jul 13, 2023 9:58:41 GMT
How did they deliberately mislead the public? There was no suggestion by the Sun that a crime had been committed although further investigations might counter that. Stating that a story is "rubbish" is far from denial. Very nonspecific dont you think? And where did the complainant get the money to pay for his lawyer to make this generic comment? Time to follow NZ and ban the US citizen Murdoch from running British companies. The Sun misled the public (e.g. 'lied') about the allegation from the start, as I said above. Your comments are pathetic 'whataboutery' of the first order. Oh, and here is a useful guide to all the stories the Sun published about this in 6 days: Another person who is part of the cancel club. No whataboutery. That long timeline of Sun headlines proves nothing about "misleading the public." |
|
|
|
Post by tiptoes on Jul 13, 2023 10:07:00 GMT
Thus far, the revelations of Edward's deviance may not yet have fallen the wrong side of criminality, although there were more reports of his tawdry behaviour against BBC employees on that programme's Newsnight channel last night. Edwards apologists have no excuse for finding other scapegoats, like the Sun, to try and excuse his dysfunctional actions. The fact that the Sun has said it will now cease to print any further unseemly developments about this highly paid media presenter is to its discredit and caving in to mob rule. If the aforesaid is a Christian as his profile suggests, through his Bible he could find redemption for his sins and seek the salvation of Jesus Christ to give him an inner peace from the turmoil for which he himself has created. You condemn Huw Edwards who hasnt committed a crime according to the police. You imply Rolf Harris is a bit of a national treasure. The obvious traits are there! Oh no, the board's Village Idiot has made an appearance. Feel free to to look through my posts and quote where I have venerated Rolf Harris. |
|
|
|
Post by tiptoes on Jul 13, 2023 11:49:18 GMT
This "mental health" card the apologists have thrown in before his latest bout to row back and plead for mitigation shouldn't deflect from Huw Edwards being a bit of a dirty old man with too much cash. If I got depressed, I'm pretty sure asking 17 year old boys for photographs of their bits would be the last cure the doc would suggest.
|
|
|
|
Post by therealab1 on Jul 13, 2023 12:20:01 GMT
You condemn Huw Edwards who hasnt committed a crime according to the police. You imply Rolf Harris is a bit of a national treasure. The obvious traits are there! Oh no, the board's Village Idiot has made an appearance. Feel free to to look through my posts and quote where I have venerated Rolf Harris. You calling me a village idiot has made me smile. We know what you are so we dont need to say it however one day youll be exposed by bigger powers than this board. |
|
|
|
Post by tiptoes on Jul 13, 2023 14:32:28 GMT
Oh no, the board's Village Idiot has made an appearance. Feel free to to look through my posts and quote where I have venerated Rolf Harris. You calling me a village idiot has made me smile. We know what you are so we dont need to say it however one day youll be exposed by bigger powers than this board. So you couldn't find any dirt on me extolling Rolf Harris, what a surprise. Just a strawman because you cant make the case either against the Sun or in defence of Huw Edwards. |
|
|
|
Post by therealab1 on Jul 13, 2023 14:50:03 GMT
You calling me a village idiot has made me smile. We know what you are so we dont need to say it however one day youll be exposed by bigger powers than this board. So you couldn't find any dirt on me extolling Rolf Harris, what a surprise. Just a strawman because you cant make the case either against the Sun or in defence of Huw Edwards. I actually couldnt care less about Huw Edwards sending a picture of his arse to someone. I have the quote you made at the time before editting it. Like I say you dont like me because i know and recognise what you are! |
|
|
|
Post by tiptoes on Jul 13, 2023 15:29:43 GMT
So you couldn't find any dirt on me extolling Rolf Harris, what a surprise. Just a strawman because you cant make the case either against the Sun or in defence of Huw Edwards. I actually couldnt care less about Huw Edwards sending a picture of his arse to someone. I have the quote you made at the time before editting it. Like I say you dont like me because i know and recognise what you are! Come on then, put it up for all to see. And you dont think a bloke who was then in his late 50s sending sordid pictures of his nether regions to a 17 year old kid, younger than his old children, is squalid behaviour that warrants censure. Weird values you possess. |
|
|
|
Post by tiptoes on Jul 16, 2023 11:22:35 GMT
|
|
