|
Post by flashblade on May 20, 2014 18:36:14 GMT
Judging by the contents of the inner circle version, I'm not sure it would be worth the effort! Good luck to the Inner Circle. Let's not criticise them because in retrospect the division into two message boards is the best thing that could have happened from everyone's point of view. We now have one board of splendidly jolly types who can cheer without question everything Good Ol' Sussex By The Sea does for right or wrong and one board of inquisitive, questioning types who can freely debate the many challenges facing the modern game without the risk of us irritating each other. The unquestioning loyalty to the infallibility of the brand by one board is admirable, but the objectivity and diversity of this board is equally laudable. Perhaps it is a shame that the two groups could not have co-habited, but ultimatelty the 'two states solution' gives everyone what they want. Now if only Amjad Khan could persuade Netanyahu of the same thing. (Although I seem to recall he got some ferocious criticism from the Inner Circle on the old message board for his humanitarian support of the Palestinian people - which kind of shows why two messageboards are better than one...) To be fair, BM, I wasn't criticising the IC message board. I just thought the Twitter stuff was uninteresting, but that's probably a reflection on Twitter generally.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 20, 2014 18:37:34 GMT
that really was complete bollards, Borderman
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 20, 2014 18:40:38 GMT
that really was complete bollards, Borderman Please expand.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 20, 2014 18:43:24 GMT
no point - your mind seems made up
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 20, 2014 18:50:39 GMT
no point - your mind seems made up Yes. My mind is made up on the basis of the evidence that that we are better off with two messageboards. I'm sorry if you think that view is ''bollards" as you so eloquently put it. You are free to post on both boards if you wish (one of them by invitation only, of course) and I was pleading for a pact of non-animosity between the two. If you have a problem with that, can you tell us what it is?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 20, 2014 18:59:59 GMT
yes sorry - para 1 was ok, para 2 & 3 were complete bollards, so do you a disservice
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 20, 2014 19:08:46 GMT
A total of six posts from you on this new board - and every one of them a sarcastic dig at this board and non-Inner Circle Sussex supporters: unofficialsussexccc.freeforums.net/user/20/recentYou clearly don't like it on here and you make it pretty obvious that you have nothing but contempt for anyone outside the Inner Circle. You even respond to a plea for mutual tolerance with "bollards". So can I ask with all due respect - why do you bother driving your train on these tracks?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 20, 2014 19:20:05 GMT
I don't think there is any animosity from the Inner Circle towards this board or the old official board, in fact from reading some of the threads on the the IC message board, BM, FB and S&F have been the best recruiters for it. So keep up the good work, and keep mentioning it.
All publicity is good publicity.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 20, 2014 19:20:29 GMT
so I am not welcome on this open forum. Ok - get the message
|
|
|
Post by hhsussex on May 20, 2014 19:24:07 GMT
I don't think there is any animosity from the Inner Circle towards this board or the old official board, in fact from reading some of the threads on the the IC message board, BM, FB and S&F have been the best recruiters for it. So keep up the good work, and keep mentioning it. All publicity is good publicity. Except when you adopt a deliberately offensive - and puerile - nickname for this board. Perhaps you'd exhibit some honesty by showing us the name you use with your Inner Circle chums?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 20, 2014 19:26:25 GMT
I don't think there is any animosity from the Inner Circle towards this board or the old official board, in fact from reading some of the threads on the the IC message board, BM, FB and S&F have been the best recruiters for it. So keep up the good work, and keep mentioning it. All publicity is good publicity. Except when you adopt a deliberately offensive - and puerile - nickname for this board. Perhaps you'd exhibit some honesty by showing us the name you use with your Inner Circle chums? And you are?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 20, 2014 19:37:21 GMT
so I am not welcome on this open forum. Ok - get the message You might say that. I couldn't possibly comment. You are certainly more welcome on here than us non-freemasons are on your secretive invitation-only board - all we ask is that you are not abusive and stop the pathetic trolling. And now ''maryhinge" (a wonderfully delicate spoonerism of the old playground expression ''hairy minge") is getting in on the act. Can I make a plea to these less mature members of the Inner Circle - if you've only got bile and animosity to peddle, please think twice before posting on here. We don't go on your messageboard and abuse you. So what is it in your sad lives makes you do it on here? And to think this started out as a polite request for mutual tolerance...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 20, 2014 19:46:50 GMT
obviously wasnt a polite request then, was it? Maybe you should re-read what you said in the first place, which was provocative (and deliberately so).
Anyway time to go
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 20, 2014 19:47:25 GMT
And to think this started out as a polite request for mutual tolerance... No it didn't, read what your acolytes were writing earlier. Looking through your members list I would say a large amount of your members, are members of the Inner Circle message board. So to stop trolling on this board, I would probably stop demeaning something most of your audience like and use regularly.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 20, 2014 20:00:30 GMT
I don't have any ''acolytes" as far as I am aware. But I wrote : "Good luck to the Inner Circle. Let's not criticise them because in retrospect the division into two message boards is the best thing that could have happened from everyone's point of view."
Now please, hairyminge, if you have nothing but spite and venom to spout, stop bringing the Inner Circle into disrepute and take your puerile comments and your misogynist name elsewhere.
I am reporting your sniggeringly offensive username to the moderators as provocative and beyond the pale.But I dare say you will then re-register as 'Big Dick' or something equally sophisticated and grown-up. Why do you do it - do your really have nothing better to do?
|
|