|
Post by joe on Apr 19, 2015 17:25:30 GMT
Blimey Coverpoint, did you get out of bed on the wrong side this morning? Great ton by Machan and useful runs from Wright, Joyce and Shahzad. I have every faith in our bowlers to skittle them all out tomorrow for under 300.
|
|
|
Post by coverpoint on Apr 19, 2015 17:32:05 GMT
Joe - I gave those four credit but I really did expect more than 49 runs from the other seven it isn't village cricket after all and especially after this: www.theargus.co.uk/sport/12898162.Sussex_ordered_to_be_more_ruthless/If that is being more ruthless then the other teams have absolutely nothing to fear from Sussex! We were poor in the final two sessions with both bat and ball.
|
|
|
Post by flashblade on Apr 19, 2015 17:55:20 GMT
Having been at the match all day until 5:30, I have some sympathy with Coverpoint's view from the keyboard.
Machan was absolutely brilliant - brimming with confidence, strong clean driving, several sixes, very fast scoring - a terrific century, and it'll be embarrassing if he loses his place (again) after this.
But the momentum gradually swung away from Sussex after Machan went. Joyce, Wright and Shahzad all made good contributions, but that was about it.
And then we couldn't take a wicket before close of play.
Entertaining day, but the Sussex performance didn't live up to its pre-lunch promise.
|
|
|
Post by coverpoint on Apr 19, 2015 17:58:51 GMT
Flashblade has expertly summed up my feelings.
|
|
|
Post by howardh on Apr 19, 2015 18:01:12 GMT
I left when we were all out. I shook my head in disbelief at the astonishibng innings played by Machan - brilliant! BUT I also shook it in disbelief at the manner of our dismissals 3 of the top 6 out pulling... erm. Spoke to Jack Shantry who said they felt they were in the game the whole time because of some uneven bounce. Kept relaying the Villa score to him on the boundary as skipper Daryl Mitchell is a massive fan. When all is said and done we should have scored 400+
|
|
|
Post by irishexile on Apr 19, 2015 19:22:00 GMT
At the end of day 1, we have a lead of 300 and the opposition have 10 wickets in hand. If we were all out from the last ball of the day for exactly 300 (same scenario) would that be satisfactory - no.
On that basis - despite Machan's knock - you would probably have to say it's been a disappointing day, but there's still plenty of time left in the game to up the ante and push for the win. I like our bowling attack so I don't think it's time to man the lifeboats just yet.
|
|
|
Post by Wicked Cricket on Apr 19, 2015 19:41:26 GMT
There is a delicious irony on the Argus website this weekend where Mark Robinson tells Steve Hollis that Sussex must be more ruthless if they become serious contenders for the Championship trophy.
They missed out on their ruthlessness today but a couple of quick wickets first thing and it could be skittle time.
|
|
|
Post by hhsussex on Apr 19, 2015 19:45:26 GMT
Well there seem to be two views of the day: either on a pitch of uneven bounce Machan somehow transcended them to produce his best ever performance, worth as much as the next highest scorers, Joyce, Shahzad and Wright, put together, or against nondescript Second Division bowling Machan came supremely good, Wright and Joyce both partially achieved what they are capable of, and Shahzad gave a further example of his fine cricketing brain and abilities, whilst all around them fled, or fell over.
Maybe the truth is not so much in the middle as woven into these overlapping threads? Certainly Joyce was outscored massively by Machan in the morning, but he looked quite untroubled and towards the end of his innings started to play some very expansive shots, the last of which cost him his wicket. At lunchtime there looked to be quite a vivid green tinge to the wicket, surprisingly so for such a dry spring. During the afternoon Cachopa, Brown and Wright all came in, looked good and got out, with only Wright doing justice to form and conditions. The Worcester bowling shuffled and reshuffled, with Andrew's initial full length and hostility fading, Morris looking game but underpaced, Shantry contorting himself amusingly , particularly to Machan, and Senanayake only taking his hands out of his pockets when he was bowling. That last-named made Wright's dismissal particularly woeful, catching him in the deep off the Gidman brother who had given up on bowling. Finally Shahzad played a mature, responsible and very skilful innings, shepherding the tail, ignoring Zaidi's bizarre dismissal, and picking off the plentiful ones and twos allowed by the very liberal field placings.
I also left at the close of the Sussex innings and can't comment on how Sussex used the pitch or how the Worcester openers played. Looked at purely in terms of the figures achieved, there is no consistency in a first session of 153-1, a second session of 147-5, and a 1/2 session of 45-4, followed by another of 45-0. And whatever else, Machan was superb and took his chance magnificently well. He showed that his future lies in the top part of the order, not hidden away at 5 or 6. Something will have to be done to accomomdate his kind of talent.
|
|
|
Post by jonboy on Apr 19, 2015 19:53:18 GMT
Really enjoyed that morning session and although I missed his century (lingering over lunch) Machan's innings was a joy to behold. Yes it was disappointing, after the start we had, not to go onto 400+, but with a long tail!, should we have expected more than 340. There was enough life in the pitch to suggest that our bowlers can get us right back in the game tomorrow morning.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 19, 2015 20:12:46 GMT
How many there today? I ask because according to cricinfo there were more than 3,000 at Cardiff, where Glamorgan showed some bold ambition by offering free admission for day one of their home programme.
Or perhaps they just didn't have the nerve to charge, given that the local residents are paying for the club's debts out of their council tax!
|
|
|
Post by hhsussex on Apr 19, 2015 20:25:43 GMT
How many there today? I ask because according to cricinfo there were more than 3,000 at Cardiff, where Glamorgan showed some bold ambition by offering free admission for day one of their home programme. Or perhaps they just didn't have the nerve to charge, given that the local residents are paying for the club's debts out of their council tax! Hopefully Sussex CCC should be able to give very precise figures, because from today they were scanning the QR codes on members' cards at the gates. My guess would be about 2000 throughout the day, though as usual on a fine Sunday, attendances fluctuated: hard-core loyalists in the morning, some of those leaving at points in the afternoon to get on with their usual Sunday pursuits, to be replaced by others drawn out by a sunny afternoon and spreading word of Machan's fine performance. How about Chelmsford, borderman? What have you to say about the pitch and the remarkable fall of wickets there?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 19, 2015 21:32:29 GMT
How many there today? I ask because according to cricinfo there were more than 3,000 at Cardiff, where Glamorgan showed some bold ambition by offering free admission for day one of their home programme. Or perhaps they just didn't have the nerve to charge, given that the local residents are paying for the club's debts out of their council tax! Hopefully Sussex CCC should be able to give very precise figures, because from today they were scanning the QR codes on members' cards at the gates. My guess would be about 2000 throughout the day, though as usual on a fine Sunday, attendances fluctuated: hard-core loyalists in the morning, some of those leaving at points in the afternoon to get on with their usual Sunday pursuits, to be replaced by others drawn out by a sunny afternoon and spreading word of Machan's fine performance. How about Chelmsford, borderman? What have you to say about the pitch and the remarkable fall of wickets there? If there were 2,000 at Hove today that's pretty good; the likes of Leics/Derbys/Northants/Kent barely average that for their Friday night T20 booze blasts. Chelmsford pitch very green; it takes some doing to produce a wicket like that when it hasn't rained for three weeks. Serves Essex right that it has backfired on them. Matt Coles was full of venom and it was good to see Kent possessing a cutting edge to their attack again; you can get away with the 70-75 mph dibbly-dobblers like Claydon and Stevens if you've got someone bowling 85+ mph at the other end. Not sure why having deliberately manufactured such a green, seaming pitch Essex then bothered to select Panesar. He didn't bowl in the Kent first innings and will be lucky if he gets to turn his arm in the match. They must have picked him for his batting and fielding!
|
|
|
Post by hhsussex on Apr 20, 2015 6:26:40 GMT
|
|
|
Post by flashblade on Apr 20, 2015 7:08:00 GMT
Yes, that pretty much sums up the day as I saw it. We need to bounce back this morning.
|
|
|
Post by hhsussex on Apr 20, 2015 7:22:29 GMT
|
|