|
Post by hhsussex on Feb 8, 2016 12:30:29 GMT
Four English county grounds - Debryshire, Gloucestersgire, Leicstershire and Somerset - as well as Lord's will host the first Women's World Cup held in England since 1993. www.icc-cricket.com/news/2016/media-releases/92207/icc-womens-world-cup-2017-venues-announcedIt is very good news for Women's cricket that it has taken the opportunity to spread the game away from the traditional power bases of the men's game and to take it out nationally. It is more than a pity since, as Clare Connor writes in the accompanying press release, there was a full house for the T20 at Hove, as there was for the corresponding 50 over game in 2013, there is no place at Sussex for innovation in a rapidly growing area of the game. Did Sussex put in a bid to host this and were turned down, or did the schedule (26 June to 23 July) threaten to offer too many clashes with men's matches? If the latter, wouldn't that have given a further stimulus to the argument that Horsham should have more, and not less investment, as an alternative to Hove and a way of bringing back the crowds in the western and northern parts of the county?
|
|
|
Post by leedsgull on Feb 8, 2016 14:24:56 GMT
Also seems odd that Chelmsford is not being used. It has regularly sold out there and I believe England are unbeaten when playing at Chelmsford. Hardly think that Derby or Leicester are likely to attract huge crowds.
|
|
|
Post by flashblade on Feb 8, 2016 14:56:57 GMT
Also seems odd that Chelmsford is not being used. It has regularly sold out there and I believe England are unbeaten when playing at Chelmsford. Hardly think that Derby or Leicester are likely to attract huge crowds. Must be because they didn't want the venues to have a southern bias, I guess.
|
|