|
Post by sussexforever on Feb 14, 2020 18:37:31 GMT
For all The 100 doomsayers out there, think again. This is a positive start. Judging from this the Hove County ground should see a sell-out for The 100 Women's Final. So is that 100k tickets across both men's and women's? Because once you factor in sold out opening game and finals of just the mens they've sold 50k across all games...or not a lot. I was initially shocked they had sold so many already! Although 100k sold for the 100 seems a bit like a marketing ploy as well. Call me cynical. Also would like to know how many are 'new' fans. Plus the fact they are giving existing members at certain grounds free tickets to boost the numbers - new fans right?
|
|
Bazpan
2nd XI player
Posts: 191
County club member: Kent
|
Post by Bazpan on Feb 15, 2020 3:12:27 GMT
If the actual matches are half as exciting as the ticket-buying process, I'll take back everything I've said about the Hundred. On Wednesday I logged on to the Hundred website 20 minutes before the 10am ticket window opening time. Shortly before 10:00 I was tossed into what they called a 'waiting room'. Half an hour later I got sprung, and was presented with an admonitory message saying I had 2 minutes and 15 seconds to complete my purchase, else I'd get thrown out of the website.
Seats were disappearing before my eyes as I tried to click on five at the end of a row (any row) and pay for them before they'd gone. I've never entered my card details so frantically. I clicked to confirm, and the page froze. I was convinced that someone else must have selected one or more of my chosen seats and beaten me on the card details drag race, rendering my order void (or worse: partially successful). But after five minutes the website cleared its throat and confirmed that my four compadres and I shall go to the Hundred ball. I went outside to get some air and calm down a bit.
Turned out I had it easy. Someone on Twitter posted a screenshot of the message he'd received upon entry to the ticketing page. It said he had to complete his order inside 1 minute 45 seconds. He didn't make it. That extra 30 seconds I was afforded probably made the difference. It's all about marginal gains.
And this being the inaugural Hundred match, which happens to be at the Oval, what about the poor city traders?! There are said to be so many of them that they could fill the Oval several times over on a Friday night piss-up in midsummer. Stressy as my own Hundred ticket-buying experience was, I still felt able to give a decent impression of a bloke in an office doing some work (I'm sure my boss didn't suspect a thing). Whereas, some of those city traders were probably losing millions of pounds on the Asian markets while they tussled with the Hundred ticketing site.
They're an odd bunch over at the Hundred's Official Team Partner, KP Snacks. Something seems to have compelled them to commission research into how many hours each year the average person spends having regrets. The answer is 110 hours, so about 18 minutes a day. Not too bad. After my trip to the Oval on 17th July I might feel that I've used up several weeks' worth. KP Snacks' marketing director Kevin McNair would probably tell me to get out of my comfort zone and try online dating.
www.thestar.co.uk/news/read-this/these-are-top-5-most-common-regrets-uk-1556227
|
|
|
Post by flashblade on Apr 22, 2020 9:48:42 GMT
|
|
|
Post by flashblade on Apr 30, 2020 13:25:58 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Wicked Cricket on Apr 30, 2020 13:35:38 GMT
No surprise. The ECB have used common sense and been sensible.
Flashblade, why on earth would the ECB want to kill the competition off having come so far? This must be some wishful thinking on your part. It just begins next summer instead.
|
|
|
Post by burgesshill on Apr 30, 2020 13:53:25 GMT
Oh dear.
How sad.
Never mind.
|
|
|
Post by flashblade on Apr 30, 2020 15:58:04 GMT
WC: you say "Flashblade, why on earth would the ECB want to kill the competition off having come so far? This must be some wishful thinking on your part." Have another look at George Dobell's article: www.espncricinfo.com/story/_/id/29081405/the-hundred-future-uncertain-ecb-board-prepares-postponementWith the ECB's coffers severely depleted after a non season in 2020, they will have to maximise revenue for the foreseeable future. The 100 is budgeted to lose money for the first 5 years, unless the counties forgo their £1.3 million pa! Many would suggest it would be folly to throw good money after bad.
|
|
|
Post by sussexforever on Apr 30, 2020 16:15:59 GMT
With the ECB's coffers severely depleted after a non season in 2020, they will have to maximise revenue for the foreseeable future. Not to mention the severe depletion from the tens of millions they have spent on the postponed tournament already.
|
|
|
Post by flashblade on Apr 30, 2020 17:20:39 GMT
With the ECB's coffers severely depleted after a non season in 2020, they will have to maximise revenue for the foreseeable future. Not to mention the severe depletion from the tens of millions they have spent on the postponed tournament already. Spot on. That money has gone. We are now where we are, hence my comment that it might be unwise to throw further good money after bad
|
|
|
Post by Wicked Cricket on May 1, 2020 9:45:33 GMT
Fb, I've had a good look at Dobell's video and read his Cricinfo article. Those who have been so against The 100 from the start are clutching at straws, imho. Even George admits: "Supporters of the Hundred would point out that the competition is projected to bring in £51m, which includes £36.5m from the home broadcast deal, £4m from the overseas broadcast deal, £6.5m from ticket sales and £4m from sponsorship, against those overall costs of £58m in the first year. Without those revenue streams, the overall saving might be more like £7m a year." The ECB have already signed a £1.1 billion media rights deal with SKY. The 100 is an integral element of that deal. So, are the ECB going to jeopardise their crucial media rights with SKY by cancelling The 100 for a paltry £7m? SKY is the only hope of saving county cricket as we emerge from the pandemic. The last thing to do, right now, is to upset them. As for the "Tens of millions spent already on the tournament" what cloud cuckoo-land does 'sussex forever' live on? As for George, a bad-tempered and grumpy man, who is constantly falling out with people, he probably can't believe his luck. Has Covid-19 saved his bacon after spending the last 2 years raging and ranting about the competition, putting his job on the line and embarrassing Cricinfo, all in the name of trying to make a name for himself? Like Piers Morgan, he is a journalist who becomes so self-obsessed with a subject that he drives this obsession on until finally it self-destructs in his face. The 100, until now, has been his journalistic nemesis. When the ECB led by Colin Graves first announced the new competition, Dobell immediately sided with the traditionalists of the game and so began a series of tweets, articles and features criticising the tournament, the ECB, and later its Chairman, Colin Graves, over even daring to consider such an outrageous idea. This fixation which developed into a vitriolic and personal vendetta against Graves during the Spring of 2018, where he highlighted the ECB Chairman's ‘conflict of interests’ with Yorkshire CCC, compelled the Board to threaten Dobell and ESPNCricinfo with a law suit. They had little choice. This action then became notorious when Private Eye (No.1467) featured the story in an April edition, outlining in some detail, aspects of the eight-page letter from London solicitors ‘Onside Law’, for their client Colin Graves, to Cricinfo demanding apologies and damages for a particular George Dobell article on his ECB stewardship. Fortunately, for George and the cricket website, after a strong rap across the knuckles and an apology from ESPNCricinfo, the ECB did not pursue the case. While Dobell emerged as a traditionalist hero for the anti-100 cause, he had been wounded by the fracas and when plans for the tournament continued unabated, his crusade limped into oblivion. But this didn’t stop our reckless journo from continuing to write snide comments about Graves as if George was Blackadder himself. Typical tweets during the late summer of 2018 included: Colin Graves is awarding the Championship Trophy tomorrow. It's like asking Margaret Thatcher to award 'coal-miner of the year.’ And Colin Graves has just been presented with something to mark England's 1,000th Test. And, I kid you not, he's dropped it.So, for a smiling Dobell, during the world’s worst pandemic since the 1960s Hong Kong flu epidemic which, so far, has killed over 230,000 people worldwide, to say that the ECB may not be able to afford to initiate the new competition, after all, due to the financial ramifications of Covid-19, is the ultimate smug of all smug. In fact, to use a possible Blackadder phrase, ”George is so smug he makes smuggness seem like a pair of pants peeing into a toilet bowl.”
|
|
|
Post by sussexforever on May 1, 2020 14:09:21 GMT
WC, I am going off articles I have read previously. such as the below: However, ECB’s financial reserves have plummeted. Their recent accounts show that from £73.1m in 2016, they have fallen to £8.6m in 2018. This, along with the fact that the cost of setting up The Hundred has increased significantly from £13m to above £40m, active efforts are being made by ECB to cut costs.
Where did the £60m go? The £40m estimate for Hundred costs excludes the county payments. Given the tournament was meant to start in a few weeks, is it not safe to assume they have spent tens of millions on it?
However, I accept we don't actually know the detail, only what the press have told us. I expect I am not far off the mark given Harrison refused on numerous occasions to answer the question 'What is the budget and how much have you spent?'.
As for Graves, the chorus of boos at T20 finals day said it all.
|
|
|
Post by glosexile on May 1, 2020 14:27:07 GMT
Oh no...not another rather dismal George Dobell bashing attempt. Not sure why you could not focus on merely disagreeing with his views, rather than attempting a sad, poor attempt to attack the personality. Never mind......borderman would surely have been proud of your efforts!
"So,for a smiling Dobell, during the world's worst pandemic since the 1960s Hong Kong flu epidemic which, so far has killed 230,000 people worldwide........". What classic irony, given the numerous misleading and contrary information that you have managed to trot out over the past weeks.
Anyway, keep up the good work George and continue to stand up for what you believe in.
|
|
|
Post by Wicked Cricket on May 1, 2020 14:53:01 GMT
glosexile,
You are so contrary. First, you gave the article a 'thumbs up', then an hour later, you erase the like and instead give it a sound bashing. Make up your mind.
Of course, writing this piece was a step into the Forum's Lions den, but the Forum needs to be woken from the lockdown slumber by offering an edge to an opposing view. I am not a fan of Dobell, I admit, but in no way to the extent and degree of borderman.
As to your, "What classic irony, given the numerous misleading and contrary information that you have managed to trot out over the past weeks" I have no idea what you're talking about. I presume you are referring to The 100 again.
|
|
|
Post by flashblade on May 1, 2020 17:55:12 GMT
glosexile, You are so contrary. First, you gave the article a 'thumbs up', then an hour later, you erase the like and instead give it a sound bashing. Make up your mind. Sounds as though he has.
Of course, writing this piece was a step into the Forum's Lions den, but the Forum needs to be woken from the lockdown slumber by offering an edge to an opposing view. I am not a fan of Dobell, I admit, but in no way to the extent and degree of borderman. I don't think the forum has been slumbering on this subject. It's certainly kept me busy!As to your, "What classic irony, given the numerous misleading and contrary information that you have managed to trot out over the past weeks" I have no idea what you're talking about. I presume you are referring to The 100 again. As a 3rd party in this context, I interpret glosexile's remarks as pertaining to this thread. Apologies if I've misread this.
|
|
|
Post by glosexile on May 1, 2020 19:15:50 GMT
glosexile, You are so contrary. First, you gave the article a 'thumbs up', then an hour later, you erase the like and instead give it a sound bashing. Make up your mind. Of course, writing this piece was a step into the Forum's Lions den, but the Forum needs to be woken from the lockdown slumber by offering an edge to an opposing view. I am not a fan of Dobell, I admit, but in no way to the extent and degree of borderman. As to your, "What classic irony, given the numerous misleading and contrary information that you have managed to trot out over the past weeks" I have no idea what you're talking about. I presume you are referring to The 100 again. The irony, of course, related to your final dig at GD ("....worst pandemic since 1960.....230,000 worldwide deaths....") and how this actually compared to your previous comments regarding coronavirus. Just to expand/clarify: At the outset, you appeared to downplay the potential seriousness of the virus. "More people die annually from flu". Quoting mortality rates at the early stages of the pandemic, in comparison to previous historic pandemics or annual death rates. Selective comments extracted from the web. You commented that you fully supported the strategy adopted by Boris, only to seemingly question the approach in subsequent days. A few other gems: In response to the observation of there being highly worried frontline NHS staff......"They are only terrified because the media are terrorising them". Suggesting that we should keep an open mind to the ramblings of people such as David Icke. (Sorry, but my mental garbage filter remained firmly switched on). Personally, l started to get the impression that more elderly people such as myself were somehow seen as expendable. In conclusion, perhaps the wonders of hindsight and reality are hopefully now starting to emerge. Footnote (Re: Like Button) Rather foolishly, this afternoon, l attempted to respond on the iPad (rather than use the normal family PC). Somewhat baffled that my attempt to copy you GD article and then respond had seemingly dismally failed. Subsequently discovered that l had mistakenly hit the Like Button....think that this is called FAT FINGER SYNDROME.
|
|