|
|
Post by coverpoint on Jul 27, 2014 17:25:42 GMT
Is Wright fit? If so he should replace Wells. I would replace Liddle with Hobden.
My team in batting order: Nash, Wright, Machan, Joyce (c), Cachopa, Piolet, Brown (+), Beer, Magoffin, Hatchett, Hobden
|
|
|
|
Post by flashblade on Jul 27, 2014 17:39:03 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by jonboy on Jul 28, 2014 6:50:43 GMT
I have just spotted young Josh Poysden the Sussex leggie made his debut for Warwickshire and took an impressive 2-49 off nine overs against Middlesex. I had wondered what had happened to him since playing for the Unicorns. So maybe his second game will be against opponents, many of whom he'll have played with during his time with the seconds
|
|
|
|
Post by coverpoint on Jul 29, 2014 11:45:11 GMT
My eleven in batting order would be Nash, Joyce, Machan, Cachopa, Finch, Wells, Brown, Piolet, Beer, Arafat, Hatchett
Please no Liddle or Zaidi!
|
|
|
|
Post by flashblade on Jul 29, 2014 14:45:58 GMT
Warks 152 for 0 after 30 overs. Guess they can play the last 20 overs in full-on T20 mode.
|
|
|
|
Post by mrsdoyle on Jul 29, 2014 15:03:17 GMT
Did Nash bowl before Beer?
|
|
|
|
Post by flashblade on Jul 29, 2014 15:46:27 GMT
Did Nash bowl before Beer? It would appear so, from the Cricinfo scorecard. |
|
|
|
Post by jonboy on Jul 29, 2014 16:02:15 GMT
What's the deal with Arafat? Can we just switch overseas players when we want, horses for courses?
|
|
|
|
Post by mrsdoyle on Jul 29, 2014 16:21:16 GMT
Did Nash bowl before Beer? It would appear so, from the Cricinfo scorecard. That is how it seemed to me which seemed a bit odd as Beer is in primarily as a bowler and Nash as a batsman. |
|
|
|
Post by flashblade on Jul 29, 2014 16:26:05 GMT
It would appear so, from the Cricinfo scorecard. That is how it seemed to me which seemed a bit odd as Beer is in primarily as a bowler and Nash as a batsman. Ah, but who are we to question the superior tactical knowledge of our betters?  |
|
|
|
Post by ketmandid on Jul 29, 2014 17:53:50 GMT
Don't we need a bit of impetus for the first ten over power play?
I thought that was the point of a power play - Joyce and Wells are good players but not necessarily power players. 48 0ff the first 10 is OK but not getting you in front of the target
Why wouldn't you have Nash as opener in the 50 over game and either Wells or Joyce at three or four depending on how the first wicket or two go.
Also you could choose your openers depending on the score required. Do we ever do that? |
|
|
|
Post by flashblade on Jul 29, 2014 18:27:54 GMT
88 for 4 after 20 overs. It's deja vu all over again.
Edit - make that 89 for 5.
|
|
|
|
Post by flashblade on Jul 29, 2014 18:33:57 GMT
. . . and that's the problem with 50 over cricket. We can now look forward to 30 tedious overs - unless something extraordinary happens.
|
|
|
|
Post by flashblade on Jul 29, 2014 18:46:15 GMT
112 for 6 Mr Z gone.
I think you're right, Lawnmower - looks as if we'll only have a few more tedious overs at this rate.
|
|
|
|
Post by mrsdoyle on Jul 29, 2014 18:47:11 GMT
What happened, went out to the garden for a bit, came back and suddenly we are six down for flip all?
|
|
