|
Post by Wicked Cricket on Jan 17, 2023 9:42:10 GMT
Meanwhile, Prince Harry has become a laughing stock on social media and U.S television. The alternative Ladybird book titles of The Prince and The Penis, The Resentful Prince, Harry and The Beast, The Royal Princes - William and the Brat and The Princess and The Spare are good ones. Prince Harry has become the butt of many jokes from U.S late night talk show hosts. Here is an example from Jimmy Kimmel offering his take on Harry's "frostbitten penis".
www.youtube.com/watch?v=hyJ_J_u6R7s
|
|
|
Post by Wicked Cricket on Jan 18, 2023 12:56:07 GMT
The official first week UK sales figure for Spare was announced yesterday by Nielsen: 467,183. Given first day sales came in at just over 400,000, where the vast majority were advanced purchases, only an additional 67,000 were sold during the opening week.
(2021 stats): There are 1,027 independent UK book shops; 311 Waterstones outlets (including Foyles, Hatchards and Blackstones); 11 Smiths stand alone book stores alongside 530 general High Street shops; 525 The Works retailers; 9 Daunt; and a plethora of online stores including a vast array on Amazon and Ebay.
Given the massive and unending publicity for Spare, is 67,000 for the last six days of the UK opening week somewhat underwhelming?
I can't wait to view the UK sales figures for February.
|
|
|
Post by tiptoes on Jan 20, 2023 8:00:11 GMT
If polls are to be believed it seems that Harry's near hatchet job on the Cambridges has had some impact with a dip in their popularity, probably only temporary, which is only going to further the already wide rift between the brothers. From what I've read, it seems a bit unfair, because with Harry's gratuitous self-pitying navel gazing and nitpicking further compounding his negative image you would have thought this would have had an obverse effect on the opinions of the relative stoicism of Will and Kate, but apparently not. www.telegraph.co.uk/royal-family/2023/01/19/prince-william-princess-kate-popularity-plunges-spare-book/
|
|
|
Post by Wicked Cricket on Jan 20, 2023 17:02:29 GMT
Tiptoes, Don’t be fooled by the guile of the mainstream media. This is a standard ploy where a headline is used to disguise the actual article content. Using the word “plunge” merely exaggerates this deception. The Daily Telegraph is being very mischievous at present. Being an establishment newspaper, shame on you! After its highly successful feature last week, when journalist Bryony Gordon interviewed the ‘Resentful Prince’ at his Californian home, which led to the chilling headline ‘There’s enough for another book – I cut memoir in half to spare my family’, leading to a swelling of Telegraph website page views, the paper is attempting to build on this success with typical misleading words. archive.md/nnYAdRead the content of this latest story and you will discover, “However, the book has had little impact on the reputation of the royals overall, with 53 per cent saying they feel favourable towards the Royal Family and 51 per cent to the King.” And goes on, “The Prince and Princess of Wales remain the most popular royals, with ratings of 61 per cent and 60 per cent respectively. Almost 70 per cent think William will be a good king.” Adding, “By comparison, Prince Harry’s favourability now stands at 23 per cent, compared with almost 70 per cent in 2018. His unfavourability is at 53 percent, compared to around 10 per cent in 2018. In the U.S, now home to the Sussexes, the Princess is the most popular royal on 47 per cent, with Harry on 4 percent, William on 40 percent and Meghan on 35 percent.” Polls are often used as a propaganda tool to twist, distort and, above all, create fake news. And why political samplings, in particular, are ridiculed on both sides of the pond for being inaccurate and hopelessly wrong. Below is the Ipsos Mori Poll in question. It asked just 1,000 British adults aged between 18 to 75, one day after Spare was released, when the hype was still building and the public had not had the time to read the full general media criticism of Harry's claims. If a poll was taken now, I am sure, ratings would show a more favourable view of the Royal Family. Yet, the primary question to ask is: Why is the Telegraph or Daily Express now focusing on this poll, ten days after it had been carried out? www.ipsos.com/sites/default/files/ct/news/documents/2023-01/Ipsos_Jan_23_Attitudes_to_the_Royal_Family_polling.pdfMeanwhile, below is a recent scandal that Ipsos Mori is embroiled in. Sums up the points I made above. Corruption is the new truth. www.scottishdailyexpress.co.uk/news/politics/revealed-ipsos-mori-snp-bias-28703346
|
|
|
Post by Wicked Cricket on Jan 22, 2023 10:16:23 GMT
“Are you ‘avin’ a laff?” Ricky Gervais might say. It’s official! The Daily Mail states the grotesque description of the Resentful Prince in Spare, placing Elizabeth Arden cream on his frost-bitten penis helping it to heal in 8 hours… sales of the £29 a pot product has shot up by 60 percent and online searches by 180 percent. Harry wrote that rubbing it on his todger reminded him of his beloved mother, Princess Diana, who had loved the cosmetic cream. Is that perverse or what? The incident now known as “Frostnipistan-gate” led to the brat writing, “The frostbite on my penis was so painful, it made walking difficult and sex impossible.” Who was he going to have sex with - a polar bear? During the present cold snap, Boots who sell the product, has tweeted, “With temperatures below zero, don't forget to stock up on your trusty Eight Hour Cream. IYKYK.” Unless you’re a spotty teenager, the acronym IYKYK means: 'If You Know You Know.' Let’s hope some clever dick writes a satirical hit song about this. The title? Answers on cream coloured paper only. www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11660879/Sales-Elizabeth-Arden-cream-soar-60-Prince-Harrys-frost-bitten-penis-revelation.htmlMeanwhile, another lucky recipient of Harry's revelation is author, Rod Mandelli, who wrote and released a thirty-minute long audio book back in 2014 which was later revised in 2020 entitled, The Prince and the Penis Pill. Sales have suddenly increased from an impotent few to a raging 'ard-on' torrent. The premise of the story? "When a sexy stranger arrives at the castle, the 'queen' devises a unique test to determine if his claims of being a real gay prince are true... Has the Prince finally found another true gay prince with whom to share his kingdom (and his muscular body) in the Enchanted Forest?" Umm, what some might describe as a true fairy tale. Listen to a sample: www.storytel.com/sg/en/books/2327244-The-Prince-The-Penis-PillThe world is mad. Long live the mad.
|
|
|
Post by Wicked Cricket on Jan 23, 2023 15:00:44 GMT
Talking of Prince Andrew (please read previous post), the real-life Royal and not the fairy-tale one, has been given an unexpected olive branch from the imprisoned Ghislaine Maxwell who says the infamous photo of Prince Andrew with sexual accuser, Virginia Guiffre, alongside Maxwell is “a resounding fake.” The mainstream media (MSM) has ejaculated into a collective frenzy about this revelation which occurred while Jeremy Kyle was interviewing Ghislaine in prison (aired Monday January 23rd on TalkTV). She tells Kyle, "I have no memory of them meeting and I don't think that picture is real," Maxwell added of the photograph. "There is no original of that photo, [only] copies of it that have been produced, copies of copies. Parts of it, according to some experts, looks like it has been photoshopped." She continues, “I don't remember her (Guiffre) in my home. I know that Virginia traveled with Jeffrey, and so it's entirely possible. But the photo doesn't appear to be real, and I don't recall it being taken.” Then adding more firmly, “It’s a fake! I don’t believe it’s real for a second. In fact, I’m sure it’s not.” Repeating, “There’s never been an original. And further, there’s no photograph. I’ve only ever seen a photocopy of it.” Ghislaine Maxwell says this is "a fake photograph"This revelation, if true, undermines the whole MSM hatchet-job on Prince Andrew and makes the woke Me-Too Movement look very foolish indeed. Yet, can you trust Maxwell, a convicted felon? To counteract this, what has she got to lose in telling her truth? The famous photo from 2001 was a strong piece of evidence in the overall destruction of Prince Andrew’s integrity with the hammer blow being his catastrophic TV interview with Emily Maitlis. The picture gave credence to Guiffre’s claims that Prince Andrew had sexually abused her on several occasions during Epstein’s “parties”. Yet, the media had little interest in recent critics who pointed to Guiffre dropping a separate sexual abuse lawsuit against American lawyer Alan Dershowitz two months ago, admitting in court documents that she "may have made a mistake" in claiming Dershowitz had abused her as a teenager. Not only is Guiffre unreliable, but like so many of the previous woke Me-Too movement participants, quick to accuse without sufficient evidence. To add further embarrassment to the media and the Me-Too movement, Prince Andrew is now weighing up legal options to overturn the $12 million settlement he struck with Giuffre. The move to have her retract the allegations against him – and even force an apology – could potentially open the path for the Duke of York to return to royal duties. This latest revelation from Ghislaine Maxwell adds weight to his potential claim. Giuffre alleged that the Duke of York raped and abused her three times in 2001 when she was 17. She filed a lawsuit against him in August 2020, and though Prince Andrew has denied the allegations, Buckingham Palace reportedly encouraged him to settle to avoid further damaging headlines from overshadowing Queen Elizabeth II’s Platinum Jubilee. The problem today, with fake news on the rampage, is who do you believe and what do you believe? Technology can create fake videos, fake photos, fake recordings, fake paintings, fake antiques, even fake fakes; while the media is constantly seeking a sensational story to sell its newspapers and attract more website page views to boost its advertising revenue. Nothing is sacred anymore, where lying and deception is the new religion.
|
|
|
Post by Wicked Cricket on Jan 25, 2023 9:09:26 GMT
"Love Him or Loathe Him..." _____________________________Jeremy Clarkson is the ultimate marmite man. Love him or loathe him, his penchant for placing his head above the parapet and clambering over the woke barricades to face the clamour… he makes up for the silent majority quietly quaking in their boots. Of course, the most recent link between Clarkson and Prince Harry still resounds in the echo chamber of social media. He dared to lambast the black widow during a recent scathing column in The Sun newspaper where he wrote, “(He) hated the Duchess of Sussex on a cellular level” and “dreamed of the day when (she) is made to parade naked through the streets of Britain as people throw lumps of excrement at her.” Even for Clarkson this was OTT, yet many of the silent majority knew what he meant and could silently offer an inner smile that at least one person had the courage to voice their views. Naturally, the woke left-wing media, triggered like Pavlov dogs, screamed from their lofty virtual-signalling fortress causing Amazon Prime Video to be the first to offer loyalty to the mob by stating Clarkson’s two different series, The Grand Tour and Clarkson’s Farm would “likely” be terminated in 2024. Immediately, an online petition was created which has now attracted close to 40,000 signatures from those asking Clarkson to be reinstated. As is the present way, Clarkson then apologised, even grovelled, as he feared the entire mainstream media would turn against him and cancel his entire existence - not once, but twice to the black widow and her resentful Prince - yet this would never be enough. Like a she-devil holding the power of the world in the palm of her hand, Meghan was not to be turned. Yet, still Clarkson refused to bow. Instead, he wrote another scathing article, this time about Woke Culture which was published in the Sunday Times at the weekend (January 22nd). Entitled, We’re in the Midst of a Coup. Who the Hell’s Behind it? While I am not a fan of Clarkson, the article makes some valid and important points and is worth a read. It is printed below. _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ‘We’re in the Midst of a Coup. Who the Hell’s Behind it?’ My son came over for a father-and-son pre-football supper the other day, and as he fussed over the Aga, making a particularly fine stir fry, we laughed about what innocuous word had been banned that day and who’d been cancelled. And then, after a pause, he said with a solemn face, “You do know there’s a war going on, don’t you?” He wasn’t talking about Ukraine. He was talking about a full-on left-wing campaign to unstitch and burn the fabric of Britain. And the genius is that no one really knows that what they’re doing is serious. We laugh as they change the name of the Sir Francis Drake Primary School to something less slavey. We think it’s all a big joke. But it isn’t. Think about what typically happens in a military operation and then look what the woke left has done here. It’s seized control of our television and radio stations to such an extent that last week Sophie Raworth said, on the BBC News at Six, with a straight face, “And over now to our LGBT and diversity correspondent ...” And TV drama? Unaffected? Right, and when was the last time you saw a fictional police force hunting a gang of Muslim extremists? It’s always the far right. And it’s the same story in comedy. Say anything you like about Boris or Rishi and the laughter track is turned up to 11. Make a joke about she/him pronouns or Greta Thunberg and they’ll blow a piece of tumbleweed across the stage. In sport we sometimes have three women doing the punditry at a men’s football match, and if anyone remarks on this on Twitter, they are immediately singled out for the india-rubber treatment. And who’s doing the erasing? Who’s making the rules? That’s just it. We don’t have a clue. What we do know is that, having taken control of the television stations, without a shot being fired, they turned their attention, like any conquering army, to the schools. Here they went fully Pol Pot, doing a comprehensive year-zero job on the curriculum so that kids would know their parents were all racists. Apart from those with “unconscious bias”. Who were racists as well. You probably think, because you don’t know this war is going on, that when you drop little Johnny off at the school gates he’s going to learn the nine times table that day. No, he isn’t. He’s learning that he might actually be a girl, which is why there are probably tampon dispensers in the boys’ lavatories. With all this in place, they set about the police, and here they’ve done a tremendous job. Because, so far as I can tell, almost all the officers in the Met — apart from the terrifying number of sexual perverts — are now more wide awake than a frightened fox. When some young people with green hair glue themselves to the road, large numbers of officers are dispatched to stand around looking at them. And they are only ever removed from the tarmac if they promise to go immediately to the nearest art gallery and throw some soup at a painting. There’s more too. In 2017 a young woman with Asperger’s posted some rap lyrics in memory of her 13-year-old friend who’d been killed in a car accident. Because these lyrics contained the n-word, as many rap songs do, apparently, the local hate crime officer decided to charge her. And the magistrates, even though the song had been played two million times on YouTube, gave the poor girl an ankle bracelet and a curfew order and made her pay £500 in costs as well as an £85 victim surcharge. The case was later overturned. Still think the loony left isn’t in control? It’s even in your office. If you run a business and you discover that a person in an androgynous trouser suit has been sitting around all day worrying about panda bears and what painting is most in need of a daubing with oxtail, you know that you absolutely cannot say anything to them about doing some, you know, work. Because then they will claim you’ve affected their mental health and you’ll have to be sacked. They are cross with you, so they make a complaint, and you haven’t got a hope in hell of surviving that. Which means you’ll have to spend every day for the next few months sitting on a bench in the park and feeding the ducks because you don’t have the courage to tell your family that you’ve been let go for using the word “homosexual”. Which, we learnt last week from a Home Office spokesperson, is a medical term. We’ve now reached a point where the leader of the opposition is so boxed in and frightened that for a while he could not answer when asked if a woman could have a penis. He knows what happened to JK Rowling when she waded into this debate. He knows that out there, hidden and invisible, there really is an army with the ability to remove from public life anyone who disagrees with its increasingly militant viewpoint. At least Arthur Scargill had the decency to get on a soapbox and state his aims in public. This lot don’t. They sit at home, hiding in the impenetrable shadow of anonymity, inventing new rules to ensnare anyone and everyone they deem to be unworthy. Monty Python joked in the Spanish Inquisition sketch that there was a crime of heresy by thought. But today it’s a reality. And at this point I was going to explain how this war is now being waged against our head of state, King Charles. But, wouldn’t you know it, I’ve run out of space. Damn!
|
|
|
Post by Wicked Cricket on Jan 25, 2023 13:06:09 GMT
It is not surprising GBNEWS takes an anti-slant towards Harry and Meghan. This morning the channel discussed the Sussex's decreasing popularity in America, once a country stronghold for them.
A recent U.S poll says Harry's popularity has dropped 45 points and Meghan 36 (whatever that means). Also, that 44 percent of those questioned in a Newsweek poll, agreed that Harry was wrong to write about private conversations he had had with members of the Royal Family.
|
|
|
Post by therealab1 on Jan 26, 2023 11:21:45 GMT
"Love Him or Loathe Him..." _____________________________Jeremy Clarkson is the ultimate marmite man. Love him or loathe him, his penchant for placing his head above the parapet and clambering over the woke barricades to face the clamour… he makes up for the silent majority quietly quaking in their boots. Of course, the most recent link between Clarkson and Prince Harry still resounds in the echo chamber of social media. He dared to lambast the black widow during a recent scathing column in The Sun newspaper where he wrote, “(He) hated the Duchess of Sussex on a cellular level” and “dreamed of the day when (she) is made to parade naked through the streets of Britain as people throw lumps of excrement at her.” Even for Clarkson this was OTT, yet many of the silent majority knew what he meant and could silently offer an inner smile that at least one person had the courage to voice their views. Naturally, the woke left-wing media, triggered like Pavlov dogs, screamed from their lofty virtual-signalling fortress causing Amazon Prime Video to be the first to offer loyalty to the mob by stating Clarkson’s two different series, The Grand Tour and Clarkson’s Farm would “likely” be terminated in 2024. Immediately, an online petition was created which has now attracted close to 40,000 signatures from those asking Clarkson to be reinstated. As is the present way, Clarkson then apologised, even grovelled, as he feared the entire mainstream media would turn against him and cancel his entire existence - not once, but twice to the black widow and her resentful Prince - yet this would never be enough. Like a she-devil holding the power of the world in the palm of her hand, Meghan was not to be turned. Yet, still Clarkson refused to bow. Instead, he wrote another scathing article, this time about Woke Culture which was published in the Sunday Times at the weekend (January 22nd). Entitled, We’re in the Midst of a Coup. Who the Hell’s Behind it? While I am not a fan of Clarkson, the article makes some valid and important points and is worth a read. It is printed below. _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ‘We’re in the Midst of a Coup. Who the Hell’s Behind it?’ My son came over for a father-and-son pre-football supper the other day, and as he fussed over the Aga, making a particularly fine stir fry, we laughed about what innocuous word had been banned that day and who’d been cancelled. And then, after a pause, he said with a solemn face, “You do know there’s a war going on, don’t you?” He wasn’t talking about Ukraine. He was talking about a full-on left-wing campaign to unstitch and burn the fabric of Britain. And the genius is that no one really knows that what they’re doing is serious. We laugh as they change the name of the Sir Francis Drake Primary School to something less slavey. We think it’s all a big joke. But it isn’t. Think about what typically happens in a military operation and then look what the woke left has done here. It’s seized control of our television and radio stations to such an extent that last week Sophie Raworth said, on the BBC News at Six, with a straight face, “And over now to our LGBT and diversity correspondent ...” And TV drama? Unaffected? Right, and when was the last time you saw a fictional police force hunting a gang of Muslim extremists? It’s always the far right. And it’s the same story in comedy. Say anything you like about Boris or Rishi and the laughter track is turned up to 11. Make a joke about she/him pronouns or Greta Thunberg and they’ll blow a piece of tumbleweed across the stage. In sport we sometimes have three women doing the punditry at a men’s football match, and if anyone remarks on this on Twitter, they are immediately singled out for the india-rubber treatment. And who’s doing the erasing? Who’s making the rules? That’s just it. We don’t have a clue. What we do know is that, having taken control of the television stations, without a shot being fired, they turned their attention, like any conquering army, to the schools. Here they went fully Pol Pot, doing a comprehensive year-zero job on the curriculum so that kids would know their parents were all racists. Apart from those with “unconscious bias”. Who were racists as well. You probably think, because you don’t know this war is going on, that when you drop little Johnny off at the school gates he’s going to learn the nine times table that day. No, he isn’t. He’s learning that he might actually be a girl, which is why there are probably tampon dispensers in the boys’ lavatories. With all this in place, they set about the police, and here they’ve done a tremendous job. Because, so far as I can tell, almost all the officers in the Met — apart from the terrifying number of sexual perverts — are now more wide awake than a frightened fox. When some young people with green hair glue themselves to the road, large numbers of officers are dispatched to stand around looking at them. And they are only ever removed from the tarmac if they promise to go immediately to the nearest art gallery and throw some soup at a painting. There’s more too. In 2017 a young woman with Asperger’s posted some rap lyrics in memory of her 13-year-old friend who’d been killed in a car accident. Because these lyrics contained the n-word, as many rap songs do, apparently, the local hate crime officer decided to charge her. And the magistrates, even though the song had been played two million times on YouTube, gave the poor girl an ankle bracelet and a curfew order and made her pay £500 in costs as well as an £85 victim surcharge. The case was later overturned. Still think the loony left isn’t in control? It’s even in your office. If you run a business and you discover that a person in an androgynous trouser suit has been sitting around all day worrying about panda bears and what painting is most in need of a daubing with oxtail, you know that you absolutely cannot say anything to them about doing some, you know, work. Because then they will claim you’ve affected their mental health and you’ll have to be sacked. They are cross with you, so they make a complaint, and you haven’t got a hope in hell of surviving that. Which means you’ll have to spend every day for the next few months sitting on a bench in the park and feeding the ducks because you don’t have the courage to tell your family that you’ve been let go for using the word “homosexual”. Which, we learnt last week from a Home Office spokesperson, is a medical term. We’ve now reached a point where the leader of the opposition is so boxed in and frightened that for a while he could not answer when asked if a woman could have a penis. He knows what happened to JK Rowling when she waded into this debate. He knows that out there, hidden and invisible, there really is an army with the ability to remove from public life anyone who disagrees with its increasingly militant viewpoint. At least Arthur Scargill had the decency to get on a soapbox and state his aims in public. This lot don’t. They sit at home, hiding in the impenetrable shadow of anonymity, inventing new rules to ensnare anyone and everyone they deem to be unworthy. Monty Python joked in the Spanish Inquisition sketch that there was a crime of heresy by thought. But today it’s a reality. And at this point I was going to explain how this war is now being waged against our head of state, King Charles. But, wouldn’t you know it, I’ve run out of space. Damn! I just simply refuse to believe everyone on the left is woke. Socialism has nothing to do with how i identify myself or other such nonsense.
|
|
|
Post by Wicked Cricket on Jan 26, 2023 12:19:12 GMT
therealab1,
I could not agree more with you.
Unfortunately, the left has been taken over by extremists who are not only making the Labour Party unelectable, but is turning UK culture into a laughing stock. My question: Why is this extremism being supported by the mainstream media and Big Business? Without their help wokeism would never have got this far.
|
|
|
Post by Wicked Cricket on Jan 28, 2023 10:58:42 GMT
Does anyone really know how many books Spare has sold to date? The mainstream media (MSM) were quick to herald the first day followed by the first week of sales. The UK we are told, sold 400,000 on opening day (January 9th) and a further 67,000 during that first week. Global sales seemed to vary given whether the media outlet supported Harry’s woke politics or not. One such figure was 1.4m for the first day covering the UK, U.S and Canada. Another was 3.2 million globally including audio and electronic books for the first week. Who knows? So long as the sales figure is headline grabbing, that’s all that matters to the media. The exaggerated one hundred thousand here or there, so what. Yet, after that first week, the MSM has gone surprisingly quiet. Carrying out an extensive internet search yesterday and today. Nothing. Null. Not a squeak. The book has been out for close on 3 weeks now. So, what about those sales figures for week two and three? Finally, I came across a U.S website called showbiz411 an hour ago. Its headline: Royal Flushed: Prince Harry’s “Spare” Drops Stunning 105% in Sales Second Week as Public Turns Against Him.The article says, “Harry’s memoir Spare fell 105% in sales for its second week. This is stunning. Second week sales were just 195,000, according to NPD Book Scan. First week sales were 629,000 (America)… compared to President Obama’s book, A Promised Land, Harry’s really collapsed. Obama only lost 51% sales in his second week." It goes on, “The huge drop reflects the public’s turn against him and his campaign against his family– especially such a short time after his grandmother, Queen Elizabeth died.” The journalist, Roger Friedman, a former Fox News contributor, concludes, “These are hard numbers for U.S sales. Don’t be swayed by press spin that includes ebooks or copies stuffed into cereal boxes. This book is a huge disappointment for Penguin Random House.” Given PRH gave Harry anywhere from $20 million to $30 million advance, the publishing house must be concerned. Meanwhile, I await with bated breath to see whether any media outlet dares to post the Spare sales for week two and three in the UK. www.showbiz411.com/2023/01/26/royal-flushed-prince-harrys-book-spare-drops-stunning-105-in-sales-second-week-as-public-turns-against-him
|
|
|
Post by gmdf on Jan 30, 2023 13:19:44 GMT
Whilst I realise you get a lot of pleasure defending the sex pest prince (Andrew) and trying to downplay the success of the prince that dared marry a mixed race woman (Harry+), it's worth pointing out that almost everyone has realised that the piss-poor attempts by the Maxwells* to defend Andrew have proved nothing, that Andrew wouldn't have paid £millions if he wasn't desperately trying to escape the just consequences of his friendship with the convicted paedophile Epstein. See: www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/prince-andrew-photo-evidence-virginia-giuffre-b2271269.html+ Harry's book still selling well, by the way. * CF. see:
|
|
|
Post by tiptoes on Jan 30, 2023 16:26:49 GMT
Paul Burrell is outdoing Harold for his latest display of self absorption and lack of stoicism.
Apparently, due to his prostate cancer which has been caught early and therefore internal, so we're not talking Bill Turnbull, Bob Willis or Andy Ripley where it became metastatic and spread to the bones or other organs with fatal consequences, this is going to be curable with excellent long term survival prospects and does not bare comparison.
But this pathetic excuse of a human has been milking it for all it's worth assisted by the luvvie Lorraine complaining that hormone treatment is giving him a hot sweat and inhibiting his beard growth coupled with the highly unlikely prospect his lifespan may have been severely affected.
Get a grip!!! You haven't been diagnosed with palliative care with a fatal form of cancer, nor MND where the road to imminent death is manifested by the loss of bodily functions to compound the brutality of the disease, nor even yet been diagnosed with more gruelling forms of treatment.
What an embarrassment of a father you are to your sons with your unconventional behaviour and pathetic self pity that are the complete antithesis of the traditional male stereotype.
|
|
|
Post by Wicked Cricket on Feb 2, 2023 12:10:18 GMT
Carla Bruni, the wife of now disgraced former French President, Nicolas Sarkozy (found guilty of corruption… twice!), is gushing about the Resentful Prince on her Instagram page. The Italian-French singer and fashion model defines herself as “a left-winger” and supports same-sex marriage and same-sex adoption. During an interview on BBC Radio 5 Live in 2020, she described herself “as a feminist”. She is also someone who leans towards the woke agenda. My point: All the staple ingredients required to support Harold, Prince of Woke. Then throw in the revolutionary overthrow of the French Royal Family, from 1789 to 1799, followed again in 1830, the French have an inherent dislike and distrust of royalty. Not forgetting the resentment towards the English and vice-a-versa over many centuries which perhaps, was one of various reasons for the success of Brexit. In a nutshell, the French don’t like the English. Bring on Waterloo and later the British and allies freeing France from Nazism, Britain has held the upper-hand since 1815. So, a perfect storm for Bruni to gush about Spare. She writes (English translation): “I loved Prince Harry of Sussex's book. It is rare for someone imprisoned in such a position to be so sincere, so clear, so true. It is rare for someone whose existence is so radically predestined to fight for a life, his own life, like any of us, like you and me. "It's brave, it's daring, it's new: but Prince Harry is indeed his mother's son Prince Harry's heart, which we feel beating on every page, tells us something that concerns us all and whoever we are. We only have one life and we have to live it as much as possible according to our instinct, according to our happiness. "Life is too short and too pointless to believe that happiness doesn't matter. No life should deprive itself of the little happiness that awaits it, that is in truth what this book, so singular and so interesting, teaches us.” The sick bowl is just behind you.
|
|
sixandout
2nd XI player
Awake, alert and ready
Posts: 154
County club member: Sussex
Blacklisted by the Inner Circle: No
|
Post by sixandout on Feb 2, 2023 13:10:36 GMT
An anagram of Carla Bruni is anal rubric #justsaying
|
|