|
|
Post by moderator1 on Jun 4, 2016 6:39:24 GMT
Another day, another tournament, another match thread.
|
|
|
|
Post by fraudster on Jun 4, 2016 9:05:23 GMT
Mix it up, rest a few, play some youth and experience. Our squad is small but good.
Joyce
Salt
Wright
Finch
Wells
Cachopa
Wiese
Jordan
Beer
Robinson
Garton
|
|
|
|
Post by joe on Jun 4, 2016 11:50:06 GMT
I'd definately play Salt and Garton. Taylor will play, Wells won't. I'd also play Beer but not Robinson.
Salt
Wright
Machan
Taylor
Finch
Brown
Jordan
Shahzad
Beer
Whittingham
Garton
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 4, 2016 13:02:32 GMT
Wright
Nash
Joyce
Taylor
Machan
Brown
Beer
Robinson
Jordan
Shahzad
Garton
Not too fussed about the exact order.
|
|
|
|
Post by coverpoint on Jun 5, 2016 17:28:59 GMT
My XI would be:
Nash
Wright (c)
Joyce
Taylor
Machan
Brown (wk)
Jordan
Shahzad
Robinson
Beer
Briggs
|
|
|
|
Post by joe on Jun 5, 2016 17:38:08 GMT
My XI would be: Nash Wright (c) Joyce Taylor Machan Brown (wk) Jordan Shahzad Robinson Beer Briggs Yes, slightly easier to predict after the squad has been announced  |
|
|
|
Post by hhsussex on Jun 5, 2016 17:46:08 GMT
No Essex team announced yet. As mentioned above, few surprises in the Sussex squad. |
|
|
|
Post by coverpoint on Jun 5, 2016 17:54:50 GMT
No Essex team announced yet. As mentioned above, few surprises in the Sussex squad. Likely to be similar to today's team although Napier and Porter for two of Dixon, Masters and Quinn would improve them team further. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 5, 2016 18:14:32 GMT
What's the unanswerable case for Briggs to be selected ahead of Garton?
|
|
|
|
Post by joe on Jun 5, 2016 18:29:13 GMT
What's the unanswerable case for Briggs to be selected ahead of Garton? I think Briggs will play, it'll be between Robinson and Garton. Personally I'd like to see Garton play, he's had a long rest now and his left-arm pace gives some variation to the bowling plus he's an outstanding fielder. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 5, 2016 18:45:53 GMT
Well, oddly we all seem to agree only five bowlers even though each must bowl ten, rather than four overs. Briggs will need to play a good hand if selected.
|
|
|
|
Post by joe on Jun 5, 2016 18:55:54 GMT
Well, oddly we all seem to agree only five bowlers even though each must bowl ten, rather than four overs. Briggs will need to play a good hand if selected. If Finch plays he could bowl a few and so could Nash. |
|
|
|
Post by fraudster on Jun 5, 2016 20:02:54 GMT
My XI would be: Nash Wright (c) Joyce Taylor Machan Brown (wk) Jordan Shahzad Robinson Beer Briggs 5 bowlers? What if one of them goes for 100? All over the shop mate, bit like Critchley. It's a shame we aren't giving Salt some valuable experience. Why not rest Machan for one game and replace him with Salt? He's played every game and it makes sense. I would rest one or two more for this one because it doesn't really weaken us but hey-ho, what do I know - that rhymed by the way. I sincerely hope we play Garton. He's shown plenty, we need to be careful not to waste these opportunities. |
|
virgs1
2nd XI player
Posts: 78
|
Post by virgs1 on Jun 6, 2016 13:40:49 GMT
Nash out early doors and rate looking slow already after 10 overs.
Need to try post at least 250 I think.
|
|
|
|
Post by fraudster on Jun 6, 2016 13:45:52 GMT
Nash out early doors and rate looking slow already after 10 overs. Need to try post at least 250 I think. And the rest. P**s poor negative start from the Dad's Army today. 35 off 11 is very old hat. And it's pretty boring. Not even playing Finch let alone Salt but we are at least playing Garton. Finch was a must today, wasteful. |
|
