foxy
2nd XI player
Posts: 31 
|
Post by foxy on Apr 22, 2017 22:10:44 GMT
Ok let's try to look forward to Thursday. New format, new day, maybe a new beginning?!
My team assuming all players fit apart from Machan
Nash
Finch
Wright
Van Zyl
Evans
Rawlins
Brown
Archer
Weise
Beer
Shazad/Garton
|
|
|
|
Post by joe on Apr 22, 2017 23:06:57 GMT
Briggs and Salt have to play. I'd like to see this line up:
Nash
Salt
Wright
Evans
Finch
Brown
Wiese
Archer
Beer
Briggs
Garton
|
|
magik
2nd XI player
Posts: 157
County club member: Sussex
|
Post by magik on Apr 23, 2017 9:07:55 GMT
Nash
Salt
Wright
Evans
Finch
Brown
Beer
Wiese
Archer
Garton
Briggs
|
|
|
|
Post by hhsussex on Apr 23, 2017 9:34:42 GMT
I know Rawlins has fluffed in the two Championship games but so have many more experienced colleagues, and the limited overs game was where he made his mark first for the Under 19s. We seem to all favour the bowling attack of Wiese Archer Garton Beer and Briggs, so how about Rawlins instead of Finch? A hard hitter and a useful extra slow bowling option perhaps.
|
|
|
|
Post by coverpoint on Apr 23, 2017 10:58:25 GMT
I know Rawlins has fluffed in the two Championship games but so have many more experienced colleagues, and the limited overs game was where he made his mark first for the Under 19s. We seem to all favour the bowling attack of Wiese Archer Garton Beer and Briggs, so how about Rawlins instead of Finch? A hard hitter and a useful extra slow bowling option perhaps. Or Salt. |
|
|
|
Post by joe on Apr 23, 2017 15:14:22 GMT
I know Rawlins has fluffed in the two Championship games but so have many more experienced colleagues, and the limited overs game was where he made his mark first for the Under 19s. We seem to all favour the bowling attack of Wiese Archer Garton Beer and Briggs, so how about Rawlins instead of Finch? A hard hitter and a useful extra slow bowling option perhaps. I wouldn't be surprised if he was favoured over Beer but I think Finch has done enough pre season to be picked and his list A average of 47 is more than useful. |
|
|
|
Post by jonboy on Apr 23, 2017 15:49:09 GMT
Still looks woefully short, batting wise, certainly if we're looking to challenge
|
|
magik
2nd XI player
Posts: 157
County club member: Sussex
|
Post by magik on Apr 23, 2017 16:18:25 GMT
What's Van Zyl's limited over record like?
|
|
|
|
Post by coverpoint on Apr 23, 2017 16:43:19 GMT
I know Rawlins has fluffed in the two Championship games but so have many more experienced colleagues, and the limited overs game was where he made his mark first for the Under 19s. We seem to all favour the bowling attack of Wiese Archer Garton Beer and Briggs, so how about Rawlins instead of Finch? A hard hitter and a useful extra slow bowling option perhaps. I wouldn't be surprised if he was favoured over Beer but I think Finch has done enough pre season to be picked and his list A average of 47 is more than useful. Beer, Finch and Rawlins should play ahead of Salt whose one-day record is modest. |
|
|
|
Post by hhsussex on Apr 23, 2017 17:51:51 GMT
What's Van Zyl's limited over record like? Generally good rather than exciting: 3131 at almost 36, strike rate 73.73. last few innings disappointing. Pretty much the standard of the purchase. |
|
|
|
Post by joe on Apr 23, 2017 17:51:57 GMT
What's Van Zyl's limited over record like? 108 games with an average of 35.98 high score of 114* 5x100's 16x50's 19 wickets @ 41 best of 4/24 |
|
magik
2nd XI player
Posts: 157
County club member: Sussex
|
Post by magik on Apr 23, 2017 17:56:02 GMT
What's Van Zyl's limited over record like? 108 games with an average of 35.98 high score of 114* 5x100's 16x50's 19 wickets @ 41 best of 4/24 I think he has to play then really. Gives him a chance to plough himself into some form. Thanks hhsussex as well. |
|
|
|
Post by jonboy on Apr 23, 2017 18:04:56 GMT
I prefer to have Luke Wright at three, but who opens with Nash? Finch looks far more comfortable coming in at 4 or 5, but presumably, that's where Van Zyl and Evans will bat. Could the in form Brown open the innings? Keeping and opening the innings is not ideal, I know, but...
|
|
magik
2nd XI player
Posts: 157
County club member: Sussex
|
Post by magik on Apr 24, 2017 7:16:17 GMT
I prefer to have Luke Wright at three, but who opens with Nash? Finch looks far more comfortable coming in at 4 or 5, but presumably, that's where Van Zyl and Evans will bat. Could the in form Brown open the innings? Keeping and opening the innings is not ideal, I know, but... I personally think leaving Ben Brown down the order is essential incase we lose a number of wickets early. If not we don't really have anyone of real class to re-build the innings around and finish it off. |
|
|
|
Post by jonboy on Apr 24, 2017 9:30:20 GMT
I prefer to have Luke Wright at three, but who opens with Nash? Finch looks far more comfortable coming in at 4 or 5, but presumably, that's where Van Zyl and Evans will bat. Could the in form Brown open the innings? Keeping and opening the innings is not ideal, I know, but... I personally think leaving Ben Brown down the order is essential incase we lose a number of wickets early. If not we don't really have anyone of real class to re-build the innings around and finish it off. Yes, and he is good at marshalling the tail. Maybe Rawlins could open then? He hasn't made the best of starts batting at three in the championship, but if he was used there ahead of a player who has opened for his country, the club must see that has the ability to bat in the top three. There isn't much difference between batting at three, and opening the innings, especially where Sussex are concerned. My side would be, Nash Rawlins Wright Van Zyl Evans or Finch Brown Wiese Archer New overseas Briggs Shahzad or Garton |
|
