Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 14, 2015 18:24:13 GMT
Leicestershire have today been docked 16 championship points for serious code breaches by their players. This is a meaningless punishment. It might as well have been 100 points as it has no effect on anything. If the players behaviour has been so bad then the punishment should be applied to next season. Well it dooms them to the wooden spoon. Without the 16 pts deduction they had a great chance of finishing 17th and handing last place to Kent. The size of the punishment seems very harsh frankly. I've hardly seen a match in recent years in which someone didn't show dissent. It's a bit like man u and penalties. Big clubs seem to get away with it and the minnows always get punished.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 14, 2015 19:39:08 GMT
Moronic scheduling of t20 qfs by the ecb. They started the third qf tonight at 5.30 at a ground without floodlights. This isn't June. In two weeks time the start of lvcc matches is brought forward 30 mins so that play can END at 5.30 before the light fades. And lo and behold eight overs into the second innings they go off for bad light. Yet the fourth qf tomorrow is scheduled to start at 2.30 at a ground that has floodlights. WTF? ??
|
|
|
Post by flashblade on Aug 14, 2015 20:16:51 GMT
Moronic scheduling of t20 qfs by the ecb. They started the third qf tonight at 5.30 at a ground without floodlights. This isn't June. In two weeks time the start of lvcc matches is brought forward 30 mins so that play can END at 5.30 before the light fades. And lo and behold eight overs into the second innings they go off for bad light. Yet the fourth qf tomorrow is scheduled to start at 2.30 at a ground that has floodlights. WTF? ?? A triumph for commercialism over commonsense. Makes you weep.
|
|
|
Post by leedsgull on Aug 15, 2015 6:41:31 GMT
Sky dictate when these fixtures are played and should have paid for the temporary installation of lights at New Road last night. The Kent match is tomorrow because the Women's Ashes fixture has been at Canterbury. Warwickshire played on Thursday night because Aston Villa played Man Utd last night and there is a march in the city today. The police would not allow the two events to coincide. Presumably Sussex and Worcester tossed a coin or something to see who played Wednesday or Friday?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 15, 2015 8:50:36 GMT
Sky dictate when these fixtures are played and should have paid for the temporary installation of lights at New Road last night. The Kent match is tomorrow because the Women's Ashes fixture has been at Canterbury. Warwickshire played on Thursday night because Aston Villa played Man Utd last night and there is a march in the city today. The police would not allow the two events to coincide. Presumably Sussex and Worcester tossed a coin or something to see who played Wednesday or Friday? None of that excuses it at all. First requirement is you play the games at a time that enables them to be finished. Therefore the game at the only ground of the four without floodlights should have been scheduled for sat or sun afternoon - or you start it at 4.30 not 5.30. Either Kent or Worcs could have hosted their game on Sunday. Or you move the qfs to grounds that can host them. Kent could have played at the oval and might have got 20,000 as it would be the last t20 London would see until next season. Worcs could have asked to play under the lights at edgbaston . Indeed I bet they now wish they had after being robbed of the chance to make their first ever finals day due to the lack of facilities at their own ground. Yet more proof of why we need a super league played in 21st century test match stadia so we don't get these parochial cock-ups. Sussex had to play wed due to northants game v Aussies
|
|
|
Post by leedsgull on Aug 15, 2015 9:34:33 GMT
Therefore the Worcester match had to be played last night. It is Sky who dictated the start time, therefore they should have paid for floodlights in my opinion.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 15, 2015 12:07:33 GMT
Therefore the Worcester match had to be played last night. It is Sky who dictated the start time, therefore they should have paid for floodlights in my opinion. [br Not really. Worcs game could have been played over the weekend. And the ecb set the start time after consultation with the broadcaster. The games on wed and thurs started at 6.30. The game on Friday was brought forward one hour due to lack of floodlights. That was a miscalculation ; clearly it should have been brought forward by two hours to 4.30. The paramount duty was to ensure playing conditions that maximize the chances of finishing the matches. Then you fit other requirements (availability of grounds, one of the counties playing the aussies etc) around that. If necessary you change grounds. But that isn't the way it was done, cricket was once again made to look stupid and the game itself and the spectators in the ground and on tv were the losers.
|
|
|
Post by flashblade on Aug 15, 2015 12:14:58 GMT
Therefore the Worcester match had to be played last night. It is Sky who dictated the start time, therefore they should have paid for floodlights in my opinion. [br Not really. Worcs game could have been played over the weekend. And the ecb set the start time after consultation with the broadcaster. The games on wed and thurs started at 6.30. The game on Friday was brought forward one hour due to lack of floodlights. That was a miscalculation ; clearly it should have been brought forward by two hours to 4.30.The paramount duty was to ensure playing conditions that maximize the chances of finishing the matches. Then you fit other requirements (availability of grounds, one of the counties playing the aussies etc) around that. If necessary you change grounds. But that isn't the way it was done, cricket was once again made to look stupid and the game itself and the spectators in the ground and on tv were the losers. I agree, in principle, BM - but Sky had scheduled the Womens test match to be broadcast right up to the start of the Worcester match. Sky seem to want to broadcast both matches on the same channel = deadlock.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 15, 2015 13:26:00 GMT
[br Not really. Worcs game could have been played over the weekend. And the ecb set the start time after consultation with the broadcaster. The games on wed and thurs started at 6.30. The game on Friday was brought forward one hour due to lack of floodlights. That was a miscalculation ; clearly it should have been brought forward by two hours to 4.30.The paramount duty was to ensure playing conditions that maximize the chances of finishing the matches. Then you fit other requirements (availability of grounds, one of the counties playing the aussies etc) around that. If necessary you change grounds. But that isn't the way it was done, cricket was once again made to look stupid and the game itself and the spectators in the ground and on tv were the losers. I agree, in principle, BM - but Sky had scheduled the Womens test match to be broadcast right up to the start of the Worcester match. Sky seem to want to broadcast both matches on the same channel = deadlock. They announced that if womens ashes was still on at 5.15 coverage from new road would be on the red button
|
|
|
Post by flashblade on Aug 15, 2015 21:10:20 GMT
|
|
|
Post by hhsussex on Aug 16, 2015 6:17:54 GMT
The key sentence here: " While Worcestershire are also culpable on this occasion, if the ECB - far richer than its county members - is to persist with the existing structure for T20 cricket and is serious about making it a success, then it needs to take proper control of the competition's administration."
|
|
|
Post by Wicked Cricket on Aug 17, 2015 8:42:33 GMT
It has been reported in the 'Daily Mail' that Essex coach Paul Grayson is to lose his job at the end of the season with Paul Nixon allegedly in the mix to take over as is Grant Flower. Grayson had been in the job 8 years and is going around in circles with the club. Alongside Robinson and Newell another long serving and loyal servant to one club. One remembers last season and the troubles that Grayson encountered. Given the Chelmsford crowd are never a sympathetic one, it will be no surprise if he leaves. This allows fresh new energy to focus on getting the club back into Division 1 and to win OD trophies once more. As counties like Essex increasingly grow off the field with their ambitious business plans, being in Division 1 becomes ever more imperative to echo these off-field successes. www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/cricket/article-3200131/Paul-Grayson-lose-job-Essex-head-coach-Paul-Nixon-line-replace-him.html
|
|
|
Post by flashblade on Aug 27, 2015 15:52:11 GMT
|
|
|
Post by fraudster on Aug 27, 2015 16:00:29 GMT
From the 1st Test pitch to a pitch like that, no *** wonder. The bloke's clearly a s**t gardener.
All the best mate
|
|
|
Post by Wicked Cricket on Aug 28, 2015 7:16:55 GMT
|
|