|
Post by mrsdoyle on Jul 8, 2015 18:54:43 GMT
Tuned in at lunch time and we were 43 for 3, things much rosier now, I know it could still all go pear shaped but I reckon we are a better side now than we were on the last home Ashes series when Bell was our only in form batsman and some idiot had Root opening.
|
|
|
Post by fraudster on Jul 8, 2015 22:01:28 GMT
I think we're about par at best myself, but we've done well to score quickly - a welcome continuation of mindset. No idea why we play Test matches on these kind of pitches though.
Oh, and in fairness Mrs D, I think Root was opening for Yorks at the time - it seemed like the obvious thing to do with him.
|
|
|
Post by mrsdoyle on Jul 9, 2015 15:00:30 GMT
I think we're about par at best myself, but we've done well to score quickly - a welcome continuation of mindset. No idea why we play Test matches on these kind of pitches though. Oh, and in fairness Mrs D, I think Root was opening for Yorks at the time - it seemed like the obvious thing to do with him. But he was doing so well down the order, if it ain't broke don't fix it.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 9, 2015 15:23:38 GMT
England had a really good day at Cardiff yesterday, but there is always one... www.espncricinfo.com/the-ashes-2015/content/story/895647.htmlTo spend almost the entirety of a 950 word report on the day's play moaning about Cook's dismissal and arguing that the way the England capain played Lyon was "not positive cricket" but "a reaction to expectation", is sheer perversity.
|
|
|
Post by hhsussex on Jul 10, 2015 6:40:29 GMT
Despite the turgid pitch, despite the combined braggadoccio and pompousness of Sky Sports and the ECB's marketing of Ashes celebrations and the rest, this is turning out to be an enthralling Test and today should see the balance move to one side or the other. Both teams have had their batting casualties from poor and ill-judged shots and bowlers have had to work hard at finding the right length. Surprisingly Broad has been much more dangerous than Johnson, though their analyses may look similar he has been unlucky and could have had at least two wickets yesterday.
It may still be too early to talk about "New England" but it does look as if both Ballance and Bell belong to some former time, like woolly mammoths lumbering along the skyline of the Shard and the Gherkin. By contrast it is good to see Moeen Ali seemingly having worked on his fallibilities against the short ball and playing with exuberance and sparkle, although a harder pitch will give him a sterner testing. His bowling, too is getting better after what looked like a bad blip in the West Indies, and both of his wickets yesterday were well thought-out and executed, both times coming after batsmen had decided he was enough of a threat to go after him.
If England bowl Australia out for 350 or less, and if the openers can build a really strong foundation then England will be able to dictate the rest of the game. It should be fun to see what happens.
|
|
|
Post by flashblade on Jul 10, 2015 7:30:11 GMT
England had a really good day at Cardiff yesterday, but there is always one... www.espncricinfo.com/the-ashes-2015/content/story/895647.htmlTo spend almost the entirety of a 950 word report on the day's play moaning about Cook's dismissal and arguing that the way the England capain played Lyon was "not positive cricket" but "a reaction to expectation", is sheer perversity. I must be psychic, BM. I knew who'd written that article without even looking!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 10, 2015 7:53:27 GMT
But I am right, aren't I, fb - It is ludicrous and seems to come from a different game to the one everyone else was following?
The desire to be 'different' and 'controversial' is fine, even laudable, but sometimes it seems to be placed above the need to connect with any sense of reality.
On day two he's concentrated his report on Moeen Ali, which is more sensible. It contains this interesting line: "Bayliss has encouraged him to vary his speed more often in an attempt to prevent batsmen from settling." Impressive by Bayliss, given that he'd never met Moeen until last week.
|
|
|
Post by hhsussex on Jul 10, 2015 7:55:31 GMT
England had a really good day at Cardiff yesterday, but there is always one... www.espncricinfo.com/the-ashes-2015/content/story/895647.htmlTo spend almost the entirety of a 950 word report on the day's play moaning about Cook's dismissal and arguing that the way the England capain played Lyon was "not positive cricket" but "a reaction to expectation", is sheer perversity. I must be psychic, BM. I knew who'd written that article without even looking! Much more balanced review today by David Hopps www.espncricinfo.com/the-ashes-2015/content/story/896029.html, though pages spoilt as cricinfo do nowadays, by the irrelevant, annoying and usually asinine video insert that plays without being requested, necessitating a rush to silence the interruption in order to concentrate on reading the content. Today's gem is the appalling Melinda Farrell, who seemed to team up with Dobell last winter and now we can't get rid of her.
|
|
|
Post by Wicked Cricket on Jul 10, 2015 10:00:40 GMT
"That's When Your Heartaches Begin" (Elvis has left 'The Swalec')
|
|
|
Post by hhsussex on Jul 10, 2015 11:22:14 GMT
England very much in front with that clatter of wickets, two of them while I was on the allotment, one when I was appreciatively gulping a restorative beer, and two while I was in the shower getting rid of the accumulated dust!
I shall now settle in and await events.....England's game to win or lose, at this stage.
|
|
|
Post by Wicked Cricket on Jul 10, 2015 11:27:34 GMT
hhs, Perhaps, it's time to dig in to this match and cultivate a perennial view on proceedings? 122 ahead - who would have mulched it.
|
|
|
Post by hhsussex on Jul 10, 2015 13:15:08 GMT
hhs, Perhaps, it's time to dig in to this match and cultivate a perennial view on proceedings? 122 ahead - who would have mulched it. Time for Root, do you think?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 11, 2015 19:59:06 GMT
Dream start for Bayliss who is going to get some ferocious stick in the Aussie press tomorrow as the most heinous traitor since Judas Iscariot, Marcus Brutus, 'honest' Iago, Mata Hari, Benedict Arnold,Edward Snowden, Lord Haw-Haw and Tokyo Rose all rolled into one.
I think much of the credit must got to Paul Farbrace, who when the history of this turbulent era in English cricket is written is going to emerge as the unsung hero.
Although I dare say it won't be long before Misery Moores of Nottinghamshire is giving cricinfo an exclusive interview claiming that Bayliss is reaping the reward of all his fantastic work with the Test team in the West Indies, just as he claimed that victory in the ODI series v NZ was all down to the brilliant foundations he laid in the world cup!...
But seriously if England win this Ashes series, Farbrace will deserve an MBE.
|
|
|
Post by hhsussex on Jul 12, 2015 8:21:07 GMT
As all good managers know the secret of inspiring high performance is that there is no secret: there are a number of techniques for reviewing and eliminating error that can be applied, and you can institute rewards systems but generally the right mix of skills accompanied by self-belief in individuals, and a good understanding of the team's objectives is what gets results. So if we track the progress of this England side from the miserable and under-achieving lot that slogged out a nothing tour of the Caribbean to the team that has just won in convincing fashion, outplaying Australia in every department of the game, it is instructive to see how those simple building-blocks have been put in place and to test how solidly they are intersticed.
Firstly, getting the right mix of skills. This is heavily influenced by selection but isn't solely the responsibility of someone appointed as a national selector. There is a strategic balance to be maintained in building teams, as well as the tactical aspects of current form, specific pitches and so on. The most notorious clanger of the Caribbbean catastrophe was selecting Trott as opener in the face of all reason and delaying the introduction of Lyth. Then there was the uncertainty about the role of spin, an uncertainty that brought in Tredwell who was half-successful, whilst not being able to contribute much else beyond close fielding, then the hastened return of Moeen, who might have been better left to get his fitness back in English cricket while the coaching team experimented with Rashid. That opportunity was lost, and so was the chance to see what Wood could offer. Instead CJ was kept in for his big heart and combativeness and his remarkable slip-fielding, and ironically England have dispensed with all of those virtues for the time being. I think he may come again, and not just in one-day cricket, but it will have to be in place of Anderson or Broad should one of them falter, and it would take another remodelling of the spearhead.
Self-belief was apparent at Cardiff in every player. Very few catches were dropped - yesterday's drop by Root was probably the biggest exception - fielding was slick and the feeling of positivity extended to Moeen taking on the short ball and generally winning. To some extent the fielding improvement may also have been a skills uprating, and it does look as if the venture to Spain, which I criticised as a jolly at the time, was successful in that the emphasis on working together, developing simple skills and excelling at them was critical here. It certainly helped Cook as a captain to feel confident in when to keep bowlers on who were being given the charge, and when to bring back the old virtues of bowling tight. It probably also helped that the squad felt comfortable enough with their own achievements that all distractions from the media circus had left town. Kevin who?
Finally, getting the runs quickly, playing the strokes that feel right for the circumstances and by so doing denying the opposition the chance to dictate the terms of engagement were the objectives that came into place during the New Zealand games and here, aided by the bowlers finally getting a chance to make their own impact, they were deployed mostly successfully. There are still some caveats about how long Bell can keep on doing his 1 good innings in 3 , or 4 or 5, and how long it is before Ballance is found out as the solution to yesterday's problem and not today's, and perhaps also some lingering doubts about whether Buttler should be a No 4 or 5 batsman, with a genuine keeper picked at 7 or 8, but overall the team holds true to a sense of purpose. I'm sure Farbrace and Bayliss use some data analysis as you would expect any coach to do - in the old days it used to be as simple as "Old Fred is always a nervous starter so bowl tight and bring one away from him and he'll probably nick to slip before he gets his eye in" - but it doesn't look as if data dictates the strategy any more than the selection.
Without doubt Farbrace has contributed greatly to the new positivity and self-belief, and it looks as if the remarkable development of Cook's skills as a captain in the field owe a lot to Bayliss as well. I also think that Strauss's role as Director of Cricket is looking daily to be one of the better appointments that have been made. He has calmed down the loose talk of Graves, dealt with the elephant in the room by opening the door and letting it trundle off, put in place what appears to be a very effective coaching team, and resisted the temptation to make further mass sackings. Perhaps Whitaker and co will disappear into deserved obscurity some time this autumn or winter: the acid test will be who selects the winter squads for Pakistan in Arabia and for South Africa.
Now on to Lord's and let us see how we deal with the fightback.
|
|
|
Post by flashblade on Jul 12, 2015 9:18:45 GMT
Excellent post, HHS. I'm glad you gave credit to Paul Farbrace, who will no longer be in the limelight - unless Bayliss pushes him forward occasionally. At the moment, Bayliss is benefiting form having inherited Farbrace's team, although I'm sure he will stamp his own mark on the squad before very long.
I'm not a Twitterer, so don't know what Piers Morgan has to say about England's success?!
|
|