|
Post by Wicked Cricket on Jun 24, 2014 17:01:01 GMT
As Ali and Anderson struggle to get a draw - a Houdini act not seen since 2009 at 'The Swalec' - the ECB are advertising for a 'People & Culture Director'. One reckons there are more important positions to be filled within the organisation. One being for a new selector and the other for a new MD, whilst on the pitch a new captain. static.ecb.co.uk/files/ecb-people-and-culture-director-12886.pdfWhat an astonishing game. What an astonishing two Tests. Harry Houdini was about to strike and then Sri Lanka win with just two balls of the match to go. WOW! Great sympathy for Anderson.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 24, 2014 18:38:09 GMT
Two reaasons why English cricket is doomed:
1. Cook has just said "I am the right man for the job" and offers the vindcation that "we won eight of the ten days in the series".
2. An ECB job description that is apparently for real and is not a spoof and which says the successful applicant will drive "a talent acquisition strategy and the implementation of a people agenda geared around ensuring attraction and retention of the best people including succession planning and talent pipelining."
Drivel on and off the pitch.
|
|
|
Post by mrsdoyle on Jun 24, 2014 18:48:02 GMT
Two reaasons why English cricket is doomed: 1. Cook has just said "I am the right man for the job" and offers the vindcation that "we won eight of the ten days in the series". 2. An ECB job description that is apparently for real and is not a spoof and which says the successful applicant will drive "a talent acquisition strategy and the implementation of a people agenda geared around ensuring attraction and retention of the best people including succession planning and talent pipelining." Drivel on and off the pitch. As soon as I work out exactly what that all means I'm applying lol, bet the position does not attract the minimum wage either.
|
|
|
Post by mrsdoyle on Jun 24, 2014 18:49:44 GMT
Bless Jimmy for his tears at the end too, at least he cares, give him the captaincy, as for Moeen, brilliant, well done him.
|
|
|
Post by hhsussex on Jun 24, 2014 19:16:37 GMT
Two reaasons why English cricket is doomed: 1. Cook has just said "I am the right man for the job" and offers the vindcation that "we won eight of the ten days in the series". 2. An ECB job description that is apparently for real and is not a spoof and which says the successful applicant will drive "a talent acquisition strategy and the implementation of a people agenda geared around ensuring attraction and retention of the best people including succession planning and talent pipelining." Drivel on and off the pitch. Well...two reasons why we can't go on with the present ECB/County Chairmen's little cosy consensus on what "people want to watch". In the end this match vindicated 5-day Test cricket as a gripping entertainment without peer, except for tight-fisted Yorkshire folk who seem to have ignored what leedsgull reported to us and couldn't/wouldn't stump up £5. It also provided a perfect riposte to borderman's earlier comment about not wanting to watch any more 5/6 hour Test centuries after growing up watching Boycott and Barrington, and I'm sure borderman will be the first to agree that Moeen Ali played almost the perfect innings in the situation into which he'd been thrown by the man who actually said "we dominated" eight days of the series. A strange kind of domination in which you find yourself desperately striving for a result, or even a no-result, at the end of each five days. Cook doesn't get it and neither do the ECB: the time for all that succession planning was yesterday and was ignored. Now almost all of those predecessors have gone, and Cook should join them as a captain, and find himself as a talented, steady opening batsman: his true, and only forte. After today I'm inclined to think that the most mature, resolute and tactically minded batsman in the side is the one with the false beard, and that isn't a joke.
|
|
|
Post by fraudster on Jun 24, 2014 21:34:59 GMT
A few months ago, on a board with a not dissimilair name to this one, I remember speculating about the likely path of Cook's captaincy. I thought that England would prepare mostly green wickets for the Sri Lankans and that in those conditions England's swing bowlers would probably give Cook a couple of vicrories which would mask his poor tactical and man-management skills and therefore take him into the India series. Once there, my reasoning went, he would very quickly find himself on the end of humiliating defeats as harder wickets and the preponderance of spin from the Indians unanswerable by England, exposed all of his shortcomings. I foresaw a mid-series resignation conference, although I was not certain about his replacement - I think I suggested Root but without great conviction. Well, we didn't quite get the pitches right and we didn't quite have the bowling attack I and others assumed - I seem to remember borderman suggesting that Onions would come back into the side and pick up a hatful on damp wickets - and it doesn't look as if we'll reach the Indian part of the drubbing without further massive changes. Other than a change of leadership its hard to see what else could be done to the side, given the newness of most of the batsmen and the lack of spinners in England, or indeed any other part of the United Kingdom. It has been interesting listening to Swann on Test Match Special this summer. He has been quite witty, and fairly perceptive, and his anecdotes have been to the point, without any lurid revelations. I've been struck by some of his remarks in this Test about Anderson particularly, and others in the side. He has said that the biggest issue for a captain is man-management and followed it up with funny stories about the extreme temperamentalism of Anderson, his single-mindedness and his unforgiving nature, bordering on the pathological, when catches go down off his bowling. What emerges is a picture of a group of very talented, very consciously elite individuals who have become used to being indulged, and whose demanding nature calls for very balanced management. Swann and Pietersen have gone, Trott too, but several remain and it doesn't look as if Cook can rise above his long apprenticeship as one of the boys to take a commanding position that wins him the respect of his star performers, a respect that is demonstrated by their willingness to change their approach. It is this aspect of Cook's captaincy rather than the negative, safety first, approach that can no longer be ignored or explained away by troubles with Flower/Pietersen/superfast bowling/mass defections. He simply doesn't have what it takes to read and react to changed circumstance, and he doesn't carry his key players with him. His own batting form has dropped away almost completely as he struggles with a task that is clearly beyond him. We need that batting even if we don't need the dithering. I still don't have a clear view of who should succeed him long-term, although I still think that Root will do so one day, and probably do it very well. I think the time has come for Moores to call Bell in and tell him he must take up the responsibility of a senior player, indeed the sole senior player remaining who would have credibility in that role. The fact the Bell himself, Swann and others have said that Bell isn't cut out for it, feels comfortable in his middle-order role, etc, etc, merely smacks of more of that elite group smugness about the way that the group view determines how individuals see themselves. It could really unleash all of the class and style of Bell, that we so desperately need to see: a dominating player who will lead a new team to rebuild itself. Welcome back Mentor. As uninspiring and tactically dense Cook seems, he just needs to change the latter really. I'd give him the summer, and Jordan, although it would be nice to have him back. Stokes for 80mph Broad might be a better shout but it won't happen. Fantastic balls Moeen. His cricket weren't bad either. I still got it y'all
|
|
|
Post by hhsussex on Jun 25, 2014 4:38:17 GMT
The face of dominance
|
|
|
Post by twelvegrand on Jun 25, 2014 8:02:45 GMT
Well in the pub we switched from internet updates with 10 balls to go to watching the channel 5 highlights on delay. Oh dear. Mighty effort by Ali and much needed given I assume Stokes was going to be swapped in for him otherwise. Now I'd assume Jordan may be the one to swap out.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 27, 2014 10:53:35 GMT
|
|
|
Post by hhsussex on Jun 27, 2014 11:23:32 GMT
In effect Warne's criticism of Cook is as much about his tendency to go into a rigid shell, based on the ideas that his senior bowlings know what they are doing and are to be respected, as it is about his lack of understanding of tactics. It is because he cannot empathise with those bowlers, understand how they sometimes need to be overruled, and give them different spells, different field placings, that he is incapable of developing as a captain. He is the batsman's batsman, with a great deal of craftsmanship and pride in his trade. I am sure he was and is a good mentor for younger batsman and wouldn't hesitate to offer advice on grip, on foot movement, timing, mental preparation and all of those things. Unfortunately that is less than half the job.
|
|
|
Post by fraudster on Jun 27, 2014 12:33:31 GMT
Cook just needs to make a decision to be more attacking. Have extra close catchers and declare earlier in the future, regardless of pitch or conditions, and it's entirely as simple as that. I doubt he'll ever be a good captain, and I suspect this is an ordinary reason to keep him but who are the alternatives? Personally, as long as he can find his own form over the summer, I think Broad could be our best shout if Cook carries on drawing us games we should be winning and losing us games we should be drawing.
|
|
|
Post by mrsdoyle on Jun 27, 2014 14:59:18 GMT
Warne comes over as the voice of reason in his piece in the Telegraph, very much butter wouldn't melt in his mouth, I am sure reading that he has never sledged anyone in his life, and last summer and winter it was never his intention to get under the skin of the English in any way, shape or form.
Of course, now his criticism is being echoed by everyone, he can afford to rein it in and word it as though he has England's and Cook's best interest at heart, just like any Aussie.
What came first, Cook's batting and captaincy decline or Warne's relentless criticism? Whichever, that decline has now reached the stage where Cook really does have to think about what is best for him and for England, and that is almost certainly his resignation as Captain.
|
|
|
Post by flashblade on Jun 27, 2014 15:05:51 GMT
Warne comes over as the voice of reason in his piece in the Telegraph, very much butter wouldn't melt in his mouth, I am sure reading that he has never sledged anyone in his life, and last summer and winter it was never his intention to get under the skin of the English in any way, shape or form. Of course, now his criticism is being echoed by everyone, he can afford to rein it in and word it as though he has England's and Cook's best interest at heart, just like any Aussie. What came first, Cook's batting and captaincy decline or Warne's relentless criticism? Whichever, that decline has now reached the stage where Cook really does have to think about what is best for him and for England, and that is almost certainly his resignation as Captain. That's a very insightful post, MrsD.
|
|
|
Post by fraudster on Jun 27, 2014 18:12:23 GMT
It's still a criticism though so what's the difference? I heard Warne, and several others, during the game. He wasn't the only one who was bursting at the seam to slaughter Cook's baffling decisions, and rightly so.
|
|