Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 18, 2016 11:02:13 GMT
Having lasted five balls in his new helmet worn under protest, will Cook defy the ECB and go back to the old and now outlawed helmet in the second innings?
|
|
|
Post by jonboy on Apr 18, 2016 11:04:48 GMT
Westley taking a liking to Shahzad now
|
|
|
Post by jonboy on Apr 18, 2016 11:13:55 GMT
Westley taking a liking to Shahzad now That's a better over
|
|
nemmo
Captain 2nd XI
Posts: 285
|
Post by nemmo on Apr 18, 2016 11:41:59 GMT
One more before lunch would be fantastic.
|
|
|
Post by jonboy on Apr 18, 2016 12:08:32 GMT
And George Garton obliges
|
|
|
Post by hhsussex on Apr 18, 2016 13:06:21 GMT
Magoffin showing all his skills and experience at a vital time with Garton flagging a little. So far it looks like Tom Westley v Sussex and despite some average fielding Sussex look well ahead.
|
|
|
Post by hhsussex on Apr 18, 2016 14:32:01 GMT
fraudster will have been delighted to see that his faith in Briggs was amply vindicated in his spell this afternoon where he gradually built pressure and succeeded in inducing a false shot from Westley. Pretty good reason for picking a spinner in a 5 man attack.
|
|
|
Post by joe on Apr 18, 2016 15:22:39 GMT
Danny Briggs second spell 6-4-2-1
|
|
|
Post by fraudster on Apr 18, 2016 16:14:38 GMT
Yeah looks like Briggs has done alright, for a first innings, but if anything he's proving me right - but really it's too early to prove anything. It isn't that you shouldn't play a spinner in a five man attack, you definitely should, but there's no point him being a defensive holding spinner, is what I meant. Briggs has bowled the most overs in the first innings again, as he did against Northants - not necessary in a five man attack. Unless you think the track is best suited to spin on day one, in which case, call the inspectors. If we'd have bowled our seamers more, particularly Garton, they'd probably be out by now.
|
|
nemmo
Captain 2nd XI
Posts: 285
|
Post by nemmo on Apr 18, 2016 17:23:13 GMT
How was the over rate before Briggs was introduced? Did that have anything to do with it?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 18, 2016 17:26:30 GMT
Yeah looks like Briggs has done alright, for a first innings, but if anything he's proving me right - but really it's too early to prove anything. It isn't that you shouldn't play a spinner in a five man attack, you definitely should, but there's no point him being a defensive holding spinner, is what I meant. Briggs has bowled the most overs in the first innings again, as he did against Northants - not necessary in a five man attack. Unless you think the track is best suited to spin on day one, in which case, call the inspectors. If we'd have bowled our seamers more, particularly Garton, they'd probably be out by now. Fraudster is broadly right, I think - not about leaving out Briggs, but certainly that if you play him and he's going to bowl more overs than anyone else, then there is no way you need four quicks. The four seamers bowled 56 overs in the day. That's an average of 14 each. If there were only three of them they would have had to bowl 18 each. I know David complained at the AGM that Robinson had left him with a squad that was unfit; but surely three seamers could have managed an extra four overs each? And if that left the poor lambs a little tired, then rotate them and let each of them carry the drinks once every three matches. Either that, or introduce a fitness regime more suited to the demands of pro cricket and which is a little more rigorous than the flabiness which Davis complains he inherited. Meanwhile, the result of this indulgent policy towards the seamers is not only a tail that begins at seven but that Harry Finch scores a big f/c hundred, which earns him a place v Northants - but then is dropped despite not getting a bat at Wantage Road. What did he do to get canned - fart too loudly in the dressing room while watching the rain fall?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 18, 2016 18:12:15 GMT
No Nash got fit and took his place (that's not to rule out loud farting but it probably wasn't the principal reason for his omission).
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 18, 2016 18:16:46 GMT
I should add that , given the size of the dressing rooms at Wantage Road, had anyone broken wind I doubt there would have been many survivors.
|
|
|
Post by coverpoint on Apr 18, 2016 18:48:34 GMT
Given we only got one bowling point at Northampton I think the decision to go with five bowlers was the correct decision. This top six should be capable of getting the runs. I'm more concerned with our ability to bowl teams out twice.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 18, 2016 18:59:59 GMT
Given we only got one bowling point at Northampton I think the decision to go with five bowlers was the correct decision. This top six should be capable of getting the runs. I'm more concerned with our ability to bowl teams out twice. But we played five bowlers against Northants, so , following your logic, should we not have played six or more against Essex?
|
|