|
Zaidi
Dec 20, 2015 18:28:57 GMT
Post by fraudster on Dec 20, 2015 18:28:57 GMT
Just because someone is a UK citizen, it doesn't mean they're not from overseas. He was born and bred in Pakistan so he is definitely from overseas - which makes him overseas. He is not like Overton, unless Overton was born and bred overseas. It might well be an anti immigrant remark, so what?
You do know that when I said Kolpak or local, I meant overseas of all kind except legitimate? You don't, judging by your post.
Why are there so many leftie simpletons in this country these days? People who refuse to accept that you can express concern about immigration or race, and not be racist. Granted, Overton hasn't done that, he's made a stupid remark which he shouldn't have. But don't hang the lad.
|
|
|
Zaidi
Jan 12, 2016 11:30:17 GMT
Post by leedsgull on Jan 12, 2016 11:30:17 GMT
Zaidi has signed a one year contract with Essex. Delighted for him and I think a shrewd signing by new coach Silverwood.
|
|
|
Zaidi
Jan 12, 2016 11:51:29 GMT
Post by flashblade on Jan 12, 2016 11:51:29 GMT
Zaidi has signed a one year contract with Essex. Delighted for him and I think a shrewd signing by new coach Silverwood. Yes, good luck to him. Sussex seemed to have nurtured him, and then, when he was coming good, they discarded him. Odd, really.
|
|
|
Zaidi
Jan 12, 2016 12:02:54 GMT
Post by Wicked Cricket on Jan 12, 2016 12:02:54 GMT
Agreed. Robinson takes one of his biggest and most endearing poker gambles and then folds with 2 aces when no-one else in the game has more than 2 jacks.
Delighted for Zaidi and I'm sure when borderman re-appears on the Forum, he'll be eulogising too. And when Sussex play Essex and Zaidi takes a fifer and scores a fifty, Robinson's decision will be questioned further by supporters.
|
|
|
Zaidi
Jan 12, 2016 14:44:52 GMT
Post by jonboy on Jan 12, 2016 14:44:52 GMT
Pleased that Zaidi has got himself a county. We ourselves are now looking pretty threadbare, especially in the seam bowling department
|
|
|
Zaidi
Jan 12, 2016 15:52:14 GMT
Post by hhsussex on Jan 12, 2016 15:52:14 GMT
I'm glad that Zaidi has got a contract, and think that a one-year deal is probably about right. I can't subscribe to the view that he was "finally coming good" , and any player who takes two years to make his mark at the age of 34 really has to consider himself lucky to have any further chances in county cricket. T20 in the BPLis one thing and I'm sure his darts were great at hustling out impetuous batsmen but in the more testing area of 4 day cricket he was hopelessly inadequate even when the pitches were wearing, never quite giving the ball enough air to get bounce or turn. His batting promised a lot, but never quite convinced that the next ball was going to be the one he would fail to read . I would very much have liked him to succeed but I think the truth is that it was about 5 years too late for him to adapt to English pitches in first class games, and his fielding was of a piece with the rest of his cricket: spirited but not quite up to the demands placed on it. A great character, a chap who tried very hard, but not a serious loss to a side that was falling over with the results of poor gambles and needed to rebuild.
I'm completely perplexed by jonboy's remark: We ourselves are now looking pretty threadbare, especially in the seam bowling department
As far as I know our resources look like this:
Possible Openers - Joyce, Wells, Nash, Salt
Middle-order batsmen - Taylor, Machan, Cachopa, Finch, Wright, Hudson-Prentice
Wicket-keeping - Brown [Agreed that we need a deputy there and I don't count Cachopa]
Pace- bowling - Shahzad, Jordan, Magoffin,Robinson, Whittingham, Anyon, Mills, Hatchett, Garton
Spin-bowling - Briggs, Beer
That doesn't seem threadbare at all, but there are some patches, notably wicket-keeper, but also an opportunity for a genuine opener, if Joyce or Nash are required to bat lower down.
|
|
|
Zaidi
Jan 12, 2016 16:26:30 GMT
Post by fraudster on Jan 12, 2016 16:26:30 GMT
"Agreed. Robinson takes one of his biggest and most endearing poker gambles and then folds with 2 aces when no-one else in the game has more than 2 jacks."
Eh?
Anywho, HH is right, at last. We aren't at all threadbare and Zaidi will not be missed - he'll take no Michelles S&F. We have a squad that's far too good for div 2, including three overseas players who can all play at once, cough cough splutter, and we should wipe the floor with all we encounter, especially Essex.
Obviously Cachopa is seen as our back-up keeper HH, what other despicable reason could there be for casting aside one of our young homegrown talents. I'd rather have kept Jackson than half that sqaud, and especially 'loophole Craig'. Mind you, it did come from 'loophole Davis' I think so no surprise.
|
|
|
Zaidi
Jan 13, 2016 9:51:23 GMT
Post by Wicked Cricket on Jan 13, 2016 9:51:23 GMT
I agree with the sentiment that Sussex should thunder all and asunder in Division 2 but the one major vulnerability is the wicket- keeping slot. There will be too much emphasis placed on Cachopa, whose form has fallen off a cliff, if Brown gets injured.
Re: Zaidi, delighted for his return to form but was it Robinson's coaching that hindered him? Some players don't do well under certain coaches.
|
|
|
Zaidi
Jan 14, 2016 7:32:45 GMT
Post by moderator1 on Jan 14, 2016 7:32:45 GMT
I think this thread is now drifting into a "Prospects for 2016" theme rather than Zaidi and his doings. I cannot copy across relevant posts into such a thread but will move the originals.
|
|
|
Zaidi
Jan 15, 2016 22:03:40 GMT
Post by fraudster on Jan 15, 2016 22:03:40 GMT
Zaidi has been mentioned or spoken of in every single post on this page Moddy, including your post and this one. How far's a drift for you?
|
|
|
Zaidi
Jan 15, 2016 22:32:37 GMT
Post by moderator1 on Jan 15, 2016 22:32:37 GMT
Zaidi has been mentioned or spoken of in every single post on this page Moddy, including your post and this one. How far's a drift for you? This reading and comprehension stuff is a bit tricky for you, fraudster. " I think this thread is now drifting into a "Prospects for 2016" theme rather than Zaidi and his doings. I cannot copy across relevant posts into such a thread but will move the originals.Where could they have gone?
|
|
|
Zaidi
Jan 16, 2016 12:07:00 GMT
Post by fraudster on Jan 16, 2016 12:07:00 GMT
Yeah, no, cos you said, no, listen. Right outside.
I won't apologise though. I'm sorry, that's just not me.
Zaidi though eh? Zaidi Zaidi Zaidi.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 25, 2016 19:22:09 GMT
Brilliant all-round performance from Zaidi in a T20 friendly between Essex and Kent today.
Two for 26 from four overs and 54 from 22 balls.
In white-ball cricket, at least, he is exactly the all-rounder Sussex are lacking. I'm still staggered that Robinson reckoned he had no future. He should have been filling Yardy's shoes this season.
|
|
|
Zaidi
Mar 27, 2016 15:28:35 GMT
Post by fraudster on Mar 27, 2016 15:28:35 GMT
Briggs is filling Yardy's shoes, I spose. Zaidi the bat, on current form, is what we're lacking though. Did Robinson let Zaidi go? And Jackson? Did he sign Briggs? And the three grads? Should he have done any of these things before he inevitably left? Zaidi was a poor signing for me but the fact that he played plenty of games while he was poor and hardly any when he was better says all you need to know about our former coach.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 27, 2016 15:41:24 GMT
Zaidi was a poor signing for me but the fact that he played plenty of games while he was poor and hardly any when he was better says all you need to know about our former coach. There is certainly something quite perverse about Robinson's treatment of Zaidi. Plucked him out of the leagues and backed a crazy but appealingly romantic hunch. The poor bloke found himself completely out of his depth in county cricket but Robinson persisted with him against all common sense until he had virtually tested his hunch to destruction. However, against the odds Zaidi turned out to be a wily old dog who learnt and adapated. Yet just as he did, Robinson decided to throw him on the scrap heap. Not one , not two, but three reasons all wrapped up in one player which illustrate why Robinson's last few years were a catastrophic catalogue of arrogant misjudgement. He should have been sacked that afternoon he ran down the dressing room steps and started shouting and swearing at the opposition - Durham, was it? - as they walked off for the tea interval. Plot totally lost and all dignity and judgement along with it.
|
|