|
|
Post by hhsussex on Jun 13, 2015 13:09:21 GMT
The only definite name appears to be that of George Dockrell, per Steve Hollis in the Argus. Currently awaiting a Sussex squad listing.
|
|
|
|
Post by flashblade on Jun 13, 2015 13:12:03 GMT
The only definite name appears to be that of George Dockrell, per Steve Hollis in the Argus. Currently awaiting a Sussex squad listing. Are we to assume that Will Beer will miss out, now that GD is here? After last night's debacle, Robbo must be thinking long and hard before he names tomorrow's squad. |
|
|
|
Post by coverpoint on Jun 13, 2015 15:06:41 GMT
Flashbade - Beer wouldn't have selected him anyway because he doesn't rate him as a championship bowler despite suggesting England should call him up for the T20 team. I think there will be only one change with Dockrell coming in for Hudson-Prentice.
|
|
|
|
Post by flashblade on Jun 13, 2015 15:11:23 GMT
Flashbade - Beer wouldn't have selected him anyway because he doesn't rate him as a championship bowler despite suggesting England should call him up for the T20 team. I think there will be only one change with Dockrell coming in for Hudson-Prentice. My mistake - I was referring to the T20 match tomorrow. Wrong thread! Is Dockrell available tomorrow, do we know? |
|
|
|
Post by coverpoint on Jun 13, 2015 15:13:58 GMT
Flashbade - Beer wouldn't have selected him anyway because he doesn't rate him as a championship bowler despite suggesting England should call him up for the T20 team. I think there will be only one change with Dockrell coming in for Hudson-Prentice. My mistake - I was referring to the T20 match tomorrow. Wrong thread! Is Dockrell available tomorrow, do we know? On the basis of the quotes in the following article I would assume it is Championship only. www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/cricket/33122574 |
|
|
|
Post by coverpoint on Jun 14, 2015 11:20:13 GMT
Team for tomorrow is presumably Yardy, Wells, Machan, Joyce (c), Nash, Wright, Brown (+), Robinson, Magoffin, Dockrell, Linley
|
|
|
|
Post by jonboy on Jun 14, 2015 11:25:42 GMT
Team for tomorrow is presumably Yardy, Wells, Machan, Joyce (c), Nash, Wright, Brown (+), Robinson, Magoffin, Dockrell, Linley What no Shahzad again? Surely he can't still be deemed unfit |
|
|
|
Post by coverpoint on Jun 14, 2015 11:32:08 GMT
Team for tomorrow is presumably Yardy, Wells, Machan, Joyce (c), Nash, Wright, Brown (+), Robinson, Magoffin, Dockrell, Linley What no Shahzad again? Surely he can't still be deemed unfit If Shahzad was fit we wouldn't have loaned Linley. 19-3-103-1 hardly suggests he is back to full fitness. |
|
|
|
Post by jonboy on Jun 14, 2015 11:35:32 GMT
What no Shahzad again? Surely he can't still be deemed unfit If Shahzad was fit we wouldn't have loaned Linley. With Mills, Jordan, Anyon and Hatchett, all unavailable, it was sensible to bring someone in. Personally, I think we may need to look at giving the youngsters, Robinson and Hobden, a rest, and having Linley around may enable us to do this |
|
|
|
Post by coverpoint on Jun 14, 2015 11:37:37 GMT
If Shahzad was fit we wouldn't have loaned Linley. With Mills, Jordan, Anyon and Hatchett, all unavailable, it was sensible to bring someone in. Personally, I think we may need to look at giving the youngsters, Robinson and Hobden, a rest, and having Linley around may enable us to do this I'm not sure we can give Robinson a rest as a tail of Magoffin, Dockrell, Linley and Hobden is far too long. |
|
|
|
Post by jonboy on Jun 14, 2015 11:48:53 GMT
Hopefully Shahzad will be fit
|
|
|
|
Post by hhsussex on Jun 14, 2015 12:03:20 GMT
Finally the Sussex Press Officer has woken from his slumbers www.sussexcricket.co.uk/news-1/loan-signings-dockrell-and-linley-join-sussex-on-loan and there is some clarification: that Linley plays in all games and Dockree CC only. The wording strongly suggests that both will play in the match beginning tomorrow so perhaps a line-up of: Wells, Yardy, Machan, Joyce, Nash, Wright, Brown, Robinson, Dockrell, Linley, Magoffin Nash has said how much he enjoys No 5, and how much of a new challenge it is for him, so the only other possibility is Craig Cahopa for Machan. Whoever, the batting really does have to come off because the tail has very little sinew, unless Robinson finds the reacquaintance with Durham's bowlers brings out the best in him. |
|
|
|
Post by coverpoint on Jun 14, 2015 16:00:20 GMT
Any chance of Wells, Yardy and Machan actually scoring some meaningful runs in this game? Our batting averages are poor. Do we have a full-time batting coach? HH - How can you leave out Machan when he is top of the batting averages? The only person Cachopa might replace is Wells or Yardy. www.bbc.co.uk/sport/cricket/teams/sussex/averages |
|
|
|
Post by flashblade on Jun 14, 2015 16:06:51 GMT
Machan's OK (top of our averages with 38.70.) Cachopa, Nash and Joyce are also well below par. |
|
|
|
Post by coverpoint on Jun 14, 2015 16:14:00 GMT
Machan's OK (top of our averages with 38.70.) Cachopa, Nash and Joyce are also well below par. It might help Joyce and Nash if they were coming in at 30-3 every innings. Since his hundred Machan has done nothing and really needs to start producing the goods as do the openers as they have a very important job to do and it is really about time all three came to the party. I am all for introducing performance related pay especially for the batsmen. Why should the batsmen be rewarded for being rubbish? Good performances deserve reward. Durham have dropped Callum MacLeod despite him being released by Scotland after scoring only 117 runs in his last 10 completed innings including a pair against Somerset. Ryan Pringle or Graham Clark will replace him. Pringle has scored 606 runs @ 46.61 for the seconds with a best of 167 and has taken 16 wickets @ 36 but hasn't passed fifty since 7th May. Clark has scored 558 runs @ 26.57 with a best of 85*. |
|
