nemmo
Captain 2nd XI
Posts: 285
|
Post by nemmo on Jul 1, 2017 20:33:00 GMT
He should be first in line as Philander's replacement in my opinion. Archer and Jordan/Garton with the new ball.
|
|
|
|
Post by jonboy on Jul 1, 2017 23:16:54 GMT
He should be first in line as Philander's replacement in my opinion. Archer and Jordan/Garton with the new ball. Would be tough on Sakande who bowled well against Gloucestershire, and took a Michelle last time out at Arundel |
|
|
|
Post by joe on Jul 2, 2017 12:29:15 GMT
He should be first in line as Philander's replacement in my opinion. Archer and Jordan/Garton with the new ball. Would be tough on Sakande who bowled well against Gloucestershire, and took a Michelle last time out at Arundel Drop Wiese play Sakande. |
|
|
|
Post by joe on Aug 20, 2017 6:52:16 GMT
Mentioned by Bob Willis on The Verdict last night as one of two ( Tom Helm being the other ) young quicks who are firmly in England's sights and who may feature sooner rather than later.
|
|
|
|
Post by howardh on Aug 21, 2017 9:22:13 GMT
Bob Willis's statement is just bizarre.
|
|
nemmo
Captain 2nd XI
Posts: 285
|
Post by nemmo on Aug 21, 2017 15:41:09 GMT
I imagine a good part of it is England's current obsession with getting a fast left arm bowler into the test setup.
|
|
|
|
Post by joe on Aug 21, 2017 16:20:35 GMT
I imagine a good part of it is England's current obsession with getting a fast left arm bowler into the test setup. Yes I'm sure you're right. I know Garton has impressed the selectors when he's played for the Lions and he was invited to train with England ahead of the second test against SA but it does seem a tad early for the lad. He's only just 20 and has played very little championship cricket. |
|
|
|
Post by liquidskin on Aug 21, 2017 17:02:18 GMT
He has to play regularly for Sussex now and England should be on our case about it. You can't have 30+ year old Kolpaks or has-beens holding up his or Whittingham's development. England have tried financial rewards to entice counties, it ain't working at Sussex, they need to get on our backs cos our Kolpak coach could not care less.
|
|
|
|
Post by ashingtonmartlet on Aug 30, 2017 7:20:17 GMT
Davis isn't a Kolpak.
|
|
|
|
Post by coverpoint on Aug 31, 2017 19:11:17 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by ashingtonmartlet on Sept 13, 2017 23:02:49 GMT
And? That doesn't make him a Kolpak. Usual lack of knowledge on this forum.
|
|
|
|
Post by flashblade on Sept 14, 2017 7:13:34 GMT
And? That doesn't make him a Kolpak. Usual lack of knowledge on this forum.Cheap jibe. If you wanted to be constructive, you'd explain why you thought someone was in error. |
|
|
|
Post by moderator1 on Sept 14, 2017 12:58:09 GMT
All: this is a thread about George Garton, not what constitutes anyone's idea of a Kolpak. All posts not on topic will be deleted.
|
|
|
|
Post by joe on Sept 25, 2017 7:52:20 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by hhsussex on Sept 25, 2017 9:35:23 GMT
Nice that Lawrence Booth is such a fan but anyone who has watched him bowl knows that he is a long way short of the consistency needed for Test match cricket. Indeed he needs more county experience to learn when to bowl a different length. He has the basic talent to succeed, great pace and an excellent yorker, but I could see Warner and Smith carving him for 100 in 15 overs and crushing his spirit. Let the Currans or the Overtons break their backs this winter and George will be the one to come through next year - provided he is given the match experience by Sussex. |
|
