|
Post by joe on May 5, 2016 7:18:57 GMT
I would bring Finch in at 6 for this game and leave out Briggs. With games ending in a draw and only 5 batting points we are starting to drift towards the bottom of the table.
Nash Joyce Machan Taylor Wells Finch Brown Robinson Shahzad ( or Whittingham if unfit ) Garton ( or Whittingham if Garton rested ) Magoffin
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 5, 2016 7:40:00 GMT
I would bring Finch in at 6 for this game and leave out Briggs. With games ending in a draw and only 5 batting points we are starting to drift towards the bottom of the table. Nash Joyce Machan Taylor Wells Finch Brown Robinson Shahzad ( or Whittingham if unfit ) Garton ( or Whittingham if Garton rested ) Magoffin Agree with that, joe. I hope Briggs has a big part to play later in the campaign and i can imagine hin having to bowl for hours and hours at Arundel next month. But as I predicted, he's not an effective red ball bowler early season. On April 16, I predicted that if Sussex insist on playing him, after four CC matches he'd have half a dozen wkts at 70 runs apiece. Well after three of those four matches, he has three wkts at 102 runs apiece, so way to go! Wells is proving more effective because he gives it a real tweak; the three days of Sussex cricket I've seen so far this season, I'm not sure I've seen Briggs turn a single ball. However nice his flight and dip might be, it ain't going to get good batsmen out. He has a strike rate of one wicket every 24 overs, which again was all too predictable. Plus we can't continue to play five bowlers, even if three of them are described as "improving all-rounders". WHatver that means, they sure as hell aren't genuine all-rounders yet. Ben Brown is desperately struggling at six and has to revert to batting at seven, at least until he finds some form.Plus Finch has done everything he can and deserves a chance. All this assuming Wright is not fit to return, which I'm pretty sure he won't be...from the above, are you suggsting that there is an injury concern about Shahzad? He certainly didn't seem a happy bunny in the last match.
|
|
|
Post by joe on May 5, 2016 7:50:48 GMT
I believe he went off with a side strain and didn't return to the field, although he did bat yesterday and didn't look injured but presumably batting doesn't put as much strain on your side as fast bowling does? I hope he didn't injur himself after he was run out on day 1, and according to friends at the ground, punched something as he got to the top of the steps!
|
|
|
Post by hhsussex on May 5, 2016 7:59:51 GMT
I agree with both of your reasoning - which must be something of a first! Re Shahzad it may be nothing more than that he is a moody so-and-so, which has been observed before. When riled up that can be an asset, otherwise I imaginbe he's a pain to his captain and coaches.
|
|
|
Post by jonboy on May 5, 2016 12:40:37 GMT
I would bring Finch in at 6 for this game and leave out Briggs. With games ending in a draw and only 5 batting points we are starting to drift towards the bottom of the table. Nash Joyce Machan Taylor Wells Finch Brown Robinson Shahzad ( or Whittingham if unfit ) Garton ( or Whittingham if Garton rested ) Magoffin Agree with that, joe. I hope Briggs has a big part to play later in the campaign and i can imagine hin having to bowl for hours and hours at Arundel next month. But as I predicted, he's not an effective red ball bowler early season. On April 16, I predicted that if Sussex insist on playing him, after four CC matches he'd have half a dozen wkts at 70 runs apiece. Well after three of those four matches, he has three wkts at 102 runs apiece, so way to go! Wells is proving more effective because he gives it a real tweak; the three days of Sussex cricket I've seen so far this season, I'm not sure I've seen Briggs turn a single ball. However nice his flight and dip might be, it ain't going to get good batsmen out. He has a strike rate of one wicket every 24 overs, which again was all too predictable. Plus we can't continue to play five bowlers, even if three of them are described as "improving all-rounders". WHatver that means, they sure as hell aren't genuine all-rounders yet. Ben Brown is desperately struggling at six and has to revert to batting at seven, at least until he finds some form.Plus Finch has done everything he can and deserves a chance. All this assuming Wright is not fit to return, which I'm pretty sure he won't be...from the above, are you suggsting that there is an injury concern about Shahzad? He certainly didn't seem a happy bunny in the last match. You'd have thought they'd have used the opportunity to look at Briggs bowling in tandem with Beer, in these Second Eleven T20 games. If it's what we plan to do when the competition starts, why not see how it works now
|
|
|
Post by hhsussex on May 5, 2016 14:22:47 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 5, 2016 14:52:54 GMT
Yes, the realism of "could be back" on May 28 is welcome. But it means there is now acceptance that before then he will miss his fourth and fifth games of the CC - almost one-third of what was meant to be a promotion campaign - and will miss at least the start of the T20 campaign.
Utterly depressing and offers no real prospect of Sussex's poor start to the season getting any better over the next three weeks.
|
|
|
Post by jonboy on May 5, 2016 14:53:23 GMT
I've given up on this season now, I can't see us being competitive in any of the three competitions
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 5, 2016 15:00:39 GMT
I've given up on this season now, I can't see us being competitive in any of the three competitions So at least we will achieve some consistency.
|
|
|
Post by jonboy on May 5, 2016 15:06:25 GMT
A season that promised so much, but as most of us feared, will deliver, well, not very much at all
|
|
|
Post by Wicked Cricket on May 5, 2016 15:15:33 GMT
|
|
|
Post by joe on May 6, 2016 18:01:17 GMT
Beer playing for Horsham tomorrow so won't be on the coach to Derby.
Grizzlys piece in the Argus today is bemoaning the fact that Beer isn't picked for CC games, it could have been written by our own fraudster!
|
|
|
Post by flashblade on May 6, 2016 18:38:57 GMT
Beer playing for Horsham tomorrow so won't be on the coach to Derby. Grizzlys piece in the Argus today is bemoaning the fact that Beer isn't picked for CC games, it could have been written by our own fraudster!Interesting - come to think of it, have you ever seen Adams and fraudster in the same room? Think on . . .
|
|
|
Post by hhsussex on May 6, 2016 18:44:47 GMT
Beer playing for Horsham tomorrow so won't be on the coach to Derby. Grizzlys piece in the Argus today is bemoaning the fact that Beer isn't picked for CC games, it could have been written by our own fraudster!Interesting - come to think of it, have you ever seen Adams and fraudster in the same room? Think on . . . And fraudster is renowned for, shall we say, mistrust of anything outside Sussex, so a job beyond the county boundaries let alone over the Irish Sea would be anathema.....
|
|
|
Post by coverpoint on May 7, 2016 7:01:28 GMT
Do you need Hatchett and Whittingham in the squad? Please to see Finch included and hopefully he will replace Briggs.
|
|