Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 13, 2016 18:25:55 GMT
Marsha:-
|
|
|
Post by Wicked Cricket on Aug 13, 2016 18:47:22 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 13, 2016 19:58:17 GMT
To those who were there: what's all this about Klinger being a cheat and not walking when he knew Christian Davis had caught him cleanly on 29? Agree with s&f that the way the older-and-really-should-know-better Davis goes on and on about it in the interview does him no favours and suggests he is feeling the heat and is under serious pressure from the poor run of results. You have to move on from such incidents, not still be endlessly whingeing about them at close of play. The sense of grievance that Sussex clearly feels is disastrous for morale and may go some of the way to explain why Glos were able to dominate sessions two and three. Luke Wright needs to nip this sort of feeling sorry for themselves metnaility in the bud. It was a major reason for last season's failures and the coach has done his captain no favours by indulging in another public bout of pointless 'if only' moaning. It also sounds as if the true extent of the 'extras' was even worse than the scorecard shows: two lots of overthrows that went for four???
|
|
|
Post by joe on Aug 14, 2016 13:50:54 GMT
Re the catch, if Davis made it clear that he was in doubt as to whether he'd caught it then the umpires couldn't give it out. It's the sort of thing that comes with experience and not the only mistake by Davis in the field. He threw a couple of wild balls at the stumps which resulted in 4 overthrows and let a skier from Klinger bounce in front of him instead of going for the catch. Hopefully he'll make amends for his mistakes with the bat.
Great to see Magoffin get his first 5fer and return to some sort of form but probably too late to make a difference to our CC campaign unfortunately.
update: out for a 5 ball duck
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 14, 2016 13:54:53 GMT
The coach merely responded to a barrage of questions about one incident. I thought he held up ok. More importantly, we've played positively today. Presumably Glos are without their best bowler so I see us declaring on 600 and winning this in a canter.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 14, 2016 13:59:31 GMT
The coach merely responded to a barrage of questions about one incident. I thought he held up ok. More importantly, we've played positively today. Presumably Glos are without their best bowler so I see us declaring on 600 and winning this in a canter. Glad I didn't mention the double-ton for Nash.
|
|
|
Post by hhsussex on Aug 14, 2016 15:16:14 GMT
The highlight of the day - apart from Chris Jordan bowling consistently too short and taking 0 for 104 - has been Gloucestetshire's Graeme van Buuren who, diving to save a boundary, scooped the ball Keystone Cops style into his face and knocked out two of his teeth. This is in addition to Gloucs bowler Norwell being hit on the helmet while batting and he will take no further part in the match.
|
|
|
Post by joe on Aug 14, 2016 15:42:03 GMT
The highlight of the day - apart from Chris Jordan bowling consistently too short and taking 0 for 104 - has been Gloucestetshire's Graeme van Buuren who, diving to save a boundary, scooped the ball Keystone Cops style into his face and knocked out two of his teeth. This is in addition to Gloucs bowler Norwell being hit on the helmet while batting and he will take no further part in the match. A toothless attack then?
|
|
|
Post by Wicked Cricket on Aug 14, 2016 16:10:48 GMT
Score at the time was 2-30?
|
|
|
Post by coverpoint on Aug 14, 2016 17:28:41 GMT
Do you still think Wells should be released S&F after scoring his FOURTH century of the season?
|
|
nemmo
Captain 2nd XI
Posts: 285
|
Post by nemmo on Aug 14, 2016 17:38:13 GMT
Good days play for Sussex. It sounds like everyone on the field who is not injured should be grateful after today's incidents!
|
|
|
Post by Wicked Cricket on Aug 14, 2016 18:10:11 GMT
Talk about the hare and tortoise. I turn up to watch the last 11 overs or so of the day's play. Wells is on 88 and requires just 12 runs for his 100.
A Member next to me who is not a Wells fan, half jokes, "Will he get his 100 before the day ends?" We take a silly bet as I state - obviously - "Yes!"
Wiese comes in with around 10 overs left and scores 38 off 46 balls including six 4s and one 6. Meanwhile, Wells plods along and with one over left, the Member turns to me, gives a wink and says, "I reckon I've won my bet!" I believed him until with two balls left in the final over Wells swished at a leg side ball - gets a top edge - and it flies for 4.
All of cricket is tainted by T20 today as Wiese portrayed, so it's almost nostalgic to watch Wells trundle his way along. His 100 coming up in 226 balls which when compared to the days of Boycott is a fair speed. And, of course, I congratulate him on his century. A top knock and one Sussex desperately needed to keep them in the game. So, no coverpoint, as I explained in a previous post, my view was more mischievous rather than derogatory. Imho, Wells style of play is more suited to Division 2 cricket, anyway, and "if" we are ever to get out of this damn Division we need a player of Wells calibre to grind out the runs while Nash, Wright, and to a lesser extent, Joyce, can swash buckle their way to a century with far greater ease.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 14, 2016 19:47:32 GMT
Totally agree about Luke Wells. I've never had any problem with four and a half hour centuries; in fact I love them. Such players are the rock in four day cricket around which the dashers can dash.
Going back to the Klinger incident, if Joe is right and Christian Davis told the umpires he didn't know if he had caught it cleanly,that made it almost impossible for Klinger to be given out and the complaints by the other, older Davis that everyone on the ground but the umpires knew it was a clean catch are even more out of order than I first thought.
Can Sussex pile it on against an attack missing its main strike bowler, secure a 200 lead and then bowl Glos out a second time under scorboard pressure to secure their second win of the season?
I'd like to think so. But as stonewall said yesterday, this is a side that has forgotten how to win and unless the picth deteriorates rapily by day four, I'd say the odds are still strongly on Klinger and company batting it out for the now customary Sussex draw.
|
|
nemmo
Captain 2nd XI
Posts: 285
|
Post by nemmo on Aug 14, 2016 21:49:02 GMT
A good situation would be a lead of 100 at lunch tomorrow without any more wickets down. Then we can afford to cut loose for a session and try to set a target over 300 as soon as possible.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 15, 2016 6:33:58 GMT
try to set a target over 300 as soon as possible. Tha requires Susex to score 667 plus ! More realistically if there is to be a result, a lead of 100, bowl them out for 250 and a chase for Sussex of 150 on the final afternoon against the clock? First things first - 27 overs this morning to score 74 runs and secure maximum batting points!
|
|